Re: Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures)

Joe Hildebrand <hildjj@cursive.net> Wed, 24 February 2016 22:32 UTC

Return-Path: <hildjj@cursive.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247611A014E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:32:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.79
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yXVgv_3xDVdY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:32:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com (mail-pa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EFD61A013B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:32:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-x235.google.com with SMTP id ho8so20717543pac.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:32:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cursive.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=v/7vKLbZrkIJ8f5TetFWVBJPCU+mzg3obGnJaZM4dKE=; b=c1efhANuEq6oHw8FUmQLg9jGRXFm+Jiy/QJKpGo+AP8AVl+zWLZIghSGLcfXGETSCB YYpzdTa8daoNEtOOVA9iN1zBVt6C4pntgywe/OrZZ/rXzls2TE7/kgHPgpkuyWQBZ8eX Ef4mdlHPBI3XynPcvxadTvKqx6MLrGRptUIGo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=v/7vKLbZrkIJ8f5TetFWVBJPCU+mzg3obGnJaZM4dKE=; b=dooEocl0oNF3oowBsQ3lCWRi31y7ku7GhKt4LUKvGdcBMl39TJFczpViWgczFYAEbj G4JTkFlm53ZHp0Sq7Y2LHAfQDlxngj6KRPhJqYpIEDWQIGhoRBCQXm6eaX73vn2w1Z0c FzFom9p3cCAwBfn8k8PmKe6b/6ly09S5EJ4Ke1ybvEekvXPrTLHutVNc4z5/rffnwIxa A7BkBr8m5qjbG6bkmfYCl8g4ui3bR8JFLXI8ESg6SfLFaip31XJ5fMi7jIaX11R1oQ2N 2jhWeF1TRT9OmRchH4QE0EhsWMngzlMdhlMV7psSYBEOxtbI1AeVxwJTRv9lva2u4lnm frcA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTSidAlC2dd377kN7eZxsfLB7zwvZat+hYXca11H/9zbVUVi3z5GGdhGC0MWgdTiQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.190.168 with SMTP id gr8mr58107604pac.23.1456353174067; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:32:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sjc-jhildebr-nitro7.cisco.com ([128.107.241.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r62sm7267763pfr.26.2016.02.24.14.32.52 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:32:53 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
Subject: Re: Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures)
From: Joe Hildebrand <hildjj@cursive.net>
In-Reply-To: <20160224213355.33998.qmail@ary.lan>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:32:51 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <61F7FA0C-5D8A-4497-867A-31590F69EA6C@cursive.net>
References: <20160224213355.33998.qmail@ary.lan>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Cr276n2roYZ1t1nvS8WY-n-rl-U>
Cc: barryleiba@computer.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 22:32:55 -0000

> On Feb 24, 2016, at 2:33 PM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> 
> ISOC has no plans to change the way the board is appointed, and if we
> were tp do so, I'm sure the IAB and everyone else would have months if
> not years of advance notice.  Is this really a problem that needs to
> be solved now?

Well, we didn't think to update BCP77 last year when we probably should have.  If the community wants to ensure that the IAB doesn't overstep its remit, we can remove this section in its entirety, and rev BCP77 for every minor change.

-- 
Joe Hildebrand