Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists")

Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org> Thu, 29 November 2012 23:16 UTC

Return-Path: <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8878A21F89C3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:16:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iw-ZtNbsJC8Y for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:16:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.195]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED70421F8947 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:16:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.12.170] ([50.58.7.243]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MWkmh-1TjthZ3bnX-00Y07b; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:16:28 -0500
Message-ID: <50B7ECD1.5080302@wonderhamster.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:16:33 -0600
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists")
References: <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD5923033897C9BF@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <CALaySJLT=6RTZahqB1LO_Aw=7sAMiyrXK=xacwrBgLieZhqeDw@mail.gmail.com> <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD59230338A657EC@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20121129105444.0b8d3400@resistor.net> <02ba01cdce76$be921580$3bb64080$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <02ba01cdce76$be921580$3bb64080$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:Zd30uoafvxtQS449DhPgi3rk/+2b1Rfi5vY2ZNOdmBZ 7TFHl7Uk/VAJaXQ6u6EP3wvPa2IhNSZ2YDdJaFQb1zI4oa3LFV Oig6u3ADDYzH3YPXfO+ZDZDINTSz3ERS72vCiABRUrQsOnUzpy yoyksZ5CNwNqrvSpqlZE9XBtVjujwsq4p9dXCHUTatvdgRkYW0 1Xyo+Z48ek8e+W89djx4x3BdqNbTJU53R7m/QPbgmbCpNvuqzT iooG1xkZmARWSxNxsMzRlZYFNLM4fecYkB4GE25H0ybuu5Otqv As5mD0DyBy3ZvEjI3/QxtfqZvhSq3oc8Q8HUKVb4cag6SBM0eZ 3JGkOw6++yysp1ofau1anDwTg3MXVuEzfVCiwUarx
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 23:16:29 -0000

On 11/29/2012 3:16 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Just picking at one point...
>
>> According to some RFC:
>>
>>     "All relevant documents to be discussed at a session should be published
>>      and available as Internet-Drafts at least two weeks before
>>      a session starts."
>>
>> If the above was followed there shouldn't be any draft submissions
>> during the week a meeting is held.
>
> What about drafts that not for discussion at a session? What about drafts that
> have completed last call or are in IESG processing?
>
> Cheers,
> Adrian

In addition to the cases Adrian asked about, isn't there also the case 
of an author/editor updating a draft that has already been discussed and 
then submitting it during IETF week?

Thanks,

Spencer