Re: Registration details for IETF 108

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Mon, 01 June 2020 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018263A11E4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 09:37:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TK1T0Wvhsh1y for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 09:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com (mail-ej1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E19C3A0911 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 09:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id mb16so9808721ejb.4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 09:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=00aWDkzisYZ3Bjk84MG/mqSbyrvq871rNGZL6tuHhLE=; b=TU4bozJvg5fR/pmGYz3vu9YZeWdjeCXkUAoCJa6S5uoHvuFnshY/GfIU7eXUVWGNc/ hi4D2JYwKnTrA0aT4MiA8dcC/wjcZ0Fp4nhsx2gPhQYx8hKrSmZC+Hq7/IwZntdi88P5 FYRHLOj2YAQgD9/eT9phPOXv2hRqwsVlt34gF0yzljxBMTyT3g1dF2QLgq6zCjOv9S9Z JffPOpJwoX0ejukjlq+HlrSOuytgA81Gwq0fAhydqpiejQhGp4GEuMiaBD7T795GdbGp yHww+d9QaCKsp/94/w9DaHNdT4SDWR9zZOXLfoLWWAUIKLDhRGX1cYhW2UL9T0wxR6Pv oC3g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=00aWDkzisYZ3Bjk84MG/mqSbyrvq871rNGZL6tuHhLE=; b=i6FXFdkzp/gfk5GwzklvWuFNQ9+uV6R+547SiX/ZnsdEY0qCaCLVNtmE/WveRPyP82 kNxOOMlijV+Fc5HNHkXXAgxSsQtdUfhBEliINRAkJwe7p58jSixVVEBzxK+Cd7TAlO7Q KOmDlW0cjai2JXXLxpzpQjqw3RETHzJppoDM5MhrpMOpnSxVdf9/tbcEfcpW7rPc2B6R N005G+fpkcS4AqKVFHIHbrzWXQ0Rh72FlDhJEq6y9zJcKbw+5fThtXSu4W6CZ3DLnDee REetdz2ClsAv7XQW87YopjPQNbHHGp5cA7drmqkE6BcE570ZD7yaHUreWkix4wjhhGGX mYUw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Nhjoel7lnkb5c91OyG4sgfH2/J+G/NQTsW9mliynKfii0GJ6e MvS9l9qpJx+hKwxAfexj2EiRKz0fZtx3LQyDS+TVQpFV
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz7z3T+kLmnl0LMXCkUE4ISCx/Aj4iwymXtI8Vh1LZvpjJcxfoyl5mgbedyAwEhiimM6AC+CIgAAJN1yqyq0rc=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8253:: with SMTP id f19mr2961271ejx.470.1591029444074; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 09:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159062833754.6110.5826748635235943562@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200531121457.0b249858@elandnews.com> <CABcZeBOzVHaSZa0A3eDz12RwNuCiHtiJL8wqvAhhLPN6YEQOkQ@mail.gmail.com> <afa11959-3348-4054-409c-803824a2f332@gmail.com> <b31bc70b-cc73-45e4-9449-d85313a88037@gmail.com> <f1d15bec-080a-7726-1921-8a06949b231f@cs.tcd.ie> <8f464404-5278-8178-66e5-44eaed748141@gmail.com> <5B1FD06B-BC4F-49E0-97A2-DF8A48CC24FB@cooperw.in> <e1044eb4-68be-1f36-eff5-f2d60e6d1ff9@gmail.com> <F6B24ECC-7969-4D72-92A3-DA6C2E47BF66@cs.ucla.edu>
In-Reply-To: <F6B24ECC-7969-4D72-92A3-DA6C2E47BF66@cs.ucla.edu>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 18:37:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMHmWnfXo4rYTxEvQ6LspMHxSo26DqZrLBin-7Wa-Dqs+w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Registration details for IETF 108
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d77b6c05a70868b5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/CvowqIwiZUCYDtl3KPKSVNHMj18>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 16:37:32 -0000

>
> (I didnt have time to follow all exchanges but do wonder whether the
> $230/person reg. fee can be reduced)
>

Is there some URL describing this decision ? What exactly is this fee for ?

Ability to attend online WG sessions ?

Does it also extend to interim meetings ?

Would it still apply when onsite meetings start to happen ?

What if chairs will call-up an informal zoom or google meet session without
any fees ? Will they be fired from chair positions of a WG ?

Would we also start to see charges for participation in email lists ? Or
charge per email sent ?

And last would recordings of the meetings be available for free ?

Depends on those answers I guess this may be very well the beginning of
email based standards process even further discouraging those not
associated with any big vendor/sponsor to participate.

Kind regards,
Robert