IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 17 July 2014 02:47 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBA61A049F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 19:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.137
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.137 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5xCkfpvFl9Ek for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 19:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B270E1A0442 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 19:47:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 25388 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2014 02:47:07 -0000
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 17 Jul 2014 02:47:07 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=646.53c7392b.k1407; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=vltGQ5rTIHuc7RYrrgYke0SxZXovLbL0YRYicTz6dJ0=; b=W2Z5M1GbJYxOIveAfqzw2g17Sfwo8F8gC9S8//Zg97VYLCmUsshNbCDfjDamQ1vGTSboOetz5CLX5n4daHbGIfeJruePT5HT91EWgINfDsXanxzUfkbFgWzhpRABrgFq3MJbjYj8i5Exhmdsg76E74A7LXYlaJ/iHVw+QGUgQB5l2kLIMO6VWYuRMI1VHLJ3M6X+35SUtIkqBgDmt7L0wzSkEhvDvekUEIpWsAd8uBengMhG3X+/fhNwMBQchI9X
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=646.53c7392b.k1407; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=vltGQ5rTIHuc7RYrrgYke0SxZXovLbL0YRYicTz6dJ0=; b=pM3zhEkSgOrOmrQvmg8dhjeOxXlqzZYslFf5zHCQigYTy46JVIPj2vdQ6kqMluK63y4bvkUJMZYeRL68mi7gZsQp+jiXmz690aZufSg3uCD4mhUpLJl2JHDOaX4/6pJbqrfpZbbZduuSQB4JypZ3Vgt2p/VHuGHGKCnG4tgN/4hbQALqTdXn4Auz7BeMzCbOdGVHD0PuOPUAZrE5idAll/euL2B3fPChdtI/XnRJXyEV3B9kd3AFNUVr2N4GMZKF
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 02:46:45 -0000
Message-ID: <20140717024645.1605.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x
In-Reply-To: <20140717022029.017DC1ADAB@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/CxsdJ3Jdnd5tQcSt3Y2WvZy5YbE
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 02:47:09 -0000

>> DMARC is estimated to cover at least 60% of the world's mailboxes.
>
>That's an interesting number, but how was it computed/counted,
>and what does it mean in reality.

It certainly means Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, AOL, and all their various
hosted services such as AT&T ISP mail in the US, as well as giant US
cable ISP Comcast.

>When the @yahoo.com reject policy had been set up, I checked whether
>I could send fake @yahoo.com Email to my private German (F)reeMail
>account and to my own company email account, and both Emails were
>properly delivered to my Mailboxes.

It's more popular among large providers than small ones.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email