Review of draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-14

Jouni Korhonen <> Tue, 10 January 2017 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D137A1289B0; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 12:04:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jouni Korhonen <>
Subject: Review of draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-14
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.40.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 12:04:36 -0800
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 20:04:37 -0000

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
Review result: Ready

I found no issues in this specification (not that I would be an expert
in multicast).
IDnits complain about one instance of lines with non-rfc3849-compliant
IPv6 addresses. That should be verified whether it actually is an

On the operations side, I am happy with the current deployment
considerations section content, and in general how some of the
deployment/operational aspects have been laid out in the document.