Re: RFC Errata proposals -- a missing piece

At 11:37 PM +0200 6/2/08, Frank Ellermann wrote:
>If what you propose boils down to "the errata should have a
>backlink to the HTML version and/or to the RFC meta data"
>it is of course fine, that is one simple global fix to the
>errata user interface.

That works for me.

>Apparently John's proposal was about the at least 60 days
>between the approval of an obsoleting / updating RFC, and
>the time when it gets its number.  For RFCs blocked by a
>MISSREF that could be years or forever.  For RFCs killed
>by an appeal it is forever, intentionally.

The RFC metadata referred to above could be updated at the time a new 
RFC is approved in its stream, not at the time the RFC itself is 
published.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf