Problem with the draft-all aliases

"Christian Huitema" <> Tue, 03 January 2017 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB5A1296F3 for <>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:39:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YiNAmav5Uyek for <>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:39:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22EF71296F0 for <>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:39:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([]) by with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from <>) id 1cOVrf-0004VC-7J for; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 21:39:28 +0100
Received: from [] ( by with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <>) id 1cOVra-0006n1-8L for; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 15:39:22 -0500
Received: (qmail 23565 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2017 20:39:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO icebox) ([]) (envelope-sender <>) by (qmail-ldap-1.03) with ESMTPA for <>; 3 Jan 2017 20:39:16 -0000
From: "Christian Huitema" <>
To: <>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:39:13 -0800
Message-ID: <095301d26601$72b1c8a0$581559e0$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdJmAXDrxsLBLbX/R6mbg/WTkLQ4mA==
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: Problem with the draft-all aliases
Authentication-Results:; auth=pass smtp.auth=
X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: unsure
X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.64)
X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIVbU93hg6Kq00BjAzYBqWlVTHAar8Je/lORhy3PZJU8LERWeKKG4PAQY Nyavp7c49L/N1imVzxQGuMdyq1ILpVFTugiLDom8V25hond3K4RsO76XSTAwtV4mg4i2ouCDa4AU hvIWAV5xUW/+gAh4vXqcCczeLlGAc1GhygwboWtiRcOb18WfxGyg6Om6u4YYm8slKdYVNzZ8xPTd V4RzBHs5hjoyEb9Oq0NWpyO3vrfYNrJwCbVSZviV1vzVlxiUlT3dKxLhoxcmaInYbR5vlqGudzLe k2TYFBStSOMccbr5Uz0sPgnpAk2KA2vJwMd1uWhCmLzOxTAcQmFWVARhgNqBNFD3an3wiMp49rVr ybSBe34TY+s3lj/RgDQoaICKQxQRCdMNhge1Unb77YyuZq44gbemmylcTBfIbB7rGFDNRBdQ80wr wyng3wNtDYr6IWSdEOMftBjsWb6BDQzjSsEw7+KMtoemwN8keIAcPKMBBQ67muZNm3G2c8/Pjjqy k0k0bdVHmDm5y9NcoZdM30MpNkbYYJ8YZ7d5zi74j6F/pxvnk7PJGygctl3LC86in/6DwZpjxPTx I2S/vwoydU3rc+Iv2rc9L0aEB794CHU7QkUmTDfMv/tVj9RPDK26f1ZS3ljmeFVRIgA8pd5GE2NV TgVI3tePcP+0TP9kyYEYiNUIrZ0QroKR1JdFqUqligeYUOp7A73HI6oJg7w/VodqDS3jhFVyYvjB Ar8iUjNZzB9tfY+mOJVw0e2xMRa7D2P5RYOa/miinTReZ5OdasFBlor8ikxQTKPsYxS4ne8tDiOh r4KrVZqMhXrs69DDK9BqLkXGaznuCfaQ1w/JpOE=
X-Recommended-Action: accept
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:39:31 -0000

Last week, I was sending a SECDIR review of a draft in WGLC last week. The
guidelines are to send such reviews to the SECDIR list, the IESG and the
<draft>.all alias. And shortly after that, I received a mail from "Mail
Delivery System <>" telling me that something
went wrong. The problem report said this (I have edited the draft author
name and domain):

<> (expanded from
    <>)g>): host[x.x.x.x] said: 551 5.7.1 SPF fail:
    ''[], ''; REJECT (in reply to RCPT TO

I just copied the review directly to the authors' individual addresses, and
they received it fine. But obviously, something is wrong in the IETF's
guidance to reviewers, or in the implementation of these expansion lists.
The simple "exploder" function just does not work if the sender is left to
the original "from" address. That exploder function is not compatible with
SPF, or presumably with DMARC. Who would be a good contact to discuss

-- Christian Huitema