Re: multihoming, was IPv10
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 30 December 2016 20:13 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1602129478 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:13:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FPyLPEa7hYNc for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:13:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22d.google.com (mail-pg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD78E12953F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:13:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id g1so141235800pgn.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:13:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=q3fOX5aIQlgUkfraGG018ruSfeDauHnKHiNZVTNASO4=; b=PSc8OztIRZ/LqA9tgcIQnES/jLNUvKXALasWVIaYO/Na7BPD/HmPS1aTJzJJfG57p6 8+czbsm0EID7Omzf4xiWS1mWE8/1TcP6xF96TLVIH2J60bmy/Ahfqu7f7BU3sTDMwpD3 Kn32bamgiToiXnzTodc/lrxgWOzO9z2AHEnF/d7p+HGhhDwDTSgtfg+mcMhK3rxGry/f Hunx9fDwKVgnwmvf/VtULF34WE2y4GeuV2qaROziNkc8+7lXMnFU7EY4tsibDYHEMEoT jyhx0FZmVNfFvthQ47mKpVv6ByJLl9M+9XoM2YexwscID82XZOCIUaE/CZ3YFbsgHilb 179g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=q3fOX5aIQlgUkfraGG018ruSfeDauHnKHiNZVTNASO4=; b=OARQnVmCZBaU1cbcDLLuR9Dhaam/7DZGsaW1lpaHNvETF3PMXuzAbZES7opA2hE472 D/Fsf/1h3UCVvIqvR1d5KVAIgQXdUViP5LARTeBcAeMsvi8nKR/7K3LG2rGPs8EGshFa JWmvctz1lJzqHZ65b8B8a4hjSZcvAb1cS9/mn8nWoSv0H0A25d/ocx8txbmX/G1kim2N q1660a9KMBitdnUBehN4cVw3EDu+r6zs+E65HqPwd6t1fUWB55dUKsRyrjPsW/my7Kpu htZjrC3s6ETUqrtFjecT/00r5RMSL2aII3sWVjcYYBGZe8O/Y3irFQXROh3vockDxXPA n3+Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXK+jkYc0debOAbTEiL+PYJbTRWtB+AdJ3zqUiU8WZomQvamZlzZPIXYOPv+/g9PvA==
X-Received: by 10.99.55.13 with SMTP id e13mr30267059pga.71.1483128801312; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:13:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.27] ([118.148.126.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h185sm114556985pfg.90.2016.12.30.12.13.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:13:20 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: multihoming, was IPv10
To: Michel Py <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <20161230024719.36002.qmail@ary.lan> <7401a840-590e-28c3-2c3f-1e4b46c34e29@gmail.com> <F04ED1585899D842B482E7ADCA581B845946D258@newserver.arneill-py.local>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <8e693ad6-debc-d21b-56f2-9b4f04664a0e@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 09:13:28 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F04ED1585899D842B482E7ADCA581B845946D258@newserver.arneill-py.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/DM2myC_hm1vBOIEa92fXCjR55c8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 20:13:22 -0000
On 30/12/2016 16:42, Michel Py wrote: > Brian, > >> Brian E Carpenter wrote : >> Which is exactly why we have to make multi-prefix multihoming work out of the box. Which is why we >> have RFC 7157 and RFC 8028 and draft-ietf-rtgwg-dst-src-routing, and we're not done yet. > > We have missed the delivery date by 14 years. Well, there never was an exact delivery date, once NAT44 arrived to quell the demand for IPv4 addresses. But the reason this is late is that it is (IMNSHO) the hardest problem in datagram networking with free-market competition between providers. And has been since 1974 when Louis Pouzin first mentioned it. Brian
- IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00.txt… Khaled Omar
- RE: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… Khaled Omar
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… Leonir Hoxha
- RE: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… Tony Hain
- Re IPv6 adoption (Was Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix… Steve Crocker
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… Randy Bush
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… shogunx
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… David Conrad
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… Randy Bush
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… shogunx
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… Patrik Fältström
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… John C Klensin
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… Patrik Fältström
- The demand for IPv4 addresses (was: IPv10) S Moonesamy
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… S Moonesamy
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… Lee Howard
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… John C Klensin
- Re: IPv6, was IPv10 John Levine
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 John Levine
- Re: IPv6, was IPv10 (fwd) John R Levine
- Re: IPv6, was IPv10 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IPv6, was IPv10 (fwd) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IPv6, was IPv10 Mark Andrews
- Re: IPv6, was IPv10 John R Levine
- Re: IPv6, was IPv10 (fwd) Mark Andrews
- Re: IPv6, was IPv10 Mark Andrews
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 Mark Andrews
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 John R Levine
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 Mark Andrews
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 Randy Bush
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 Randy Bush
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 John Levine
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 Mark Andrews
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 Brian E Carpenter
- RE: multihoming, was IPv10 Michel Py
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 John C Klensin
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 John R Levine
- Re: IPv6, was IPv10 shogunx
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… Patrik Fältström
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… Randy Bush
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… heasley
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… Patrik Fältström
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 Masataka Ohta
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… Randy Bush
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 Octavio Alvarez
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 Stewart Bryant
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 Masataka Ohta
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… David Farmer
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 Jeff Tantsura
- Re: why v6 still isn't ready, was IPv10 John Levine
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 Masataka Ohta
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… Randy Bush
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00… Randy Bush
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10 Randy Bush
- Re: why v6 still isn't ready, was IPv10 Randy Bush
- Re: why v6 still isn't ready, was IPv10 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: why v6 still isn't ready, was IPv10 Randy Bush