IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: List of standards

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Wed, 18 August 2004 18:05 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA26059; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:05:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BxUuq-0002qB-EE; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:12:08 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BxUjj-0000ml-6u; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:00:35 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BxUZH-0007iS-4S for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:50:17 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA25207 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:49:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ns.jck.com ([209.187.148.211] helo=bs.jck.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BxUfC-0002aJ-5C for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:55:55 -0400
Received: from [209.187.148.215] (helo=scan.jck.com) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BxUYd-0006ii-PI; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:49:07 -0400
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:49:07 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: ThomasGal@LumenVox.com, gwz@cisco.com, 'Ian Cooper' <ian@the-coopers.org>, 'Bob Braden' <braden@ISI.EDU>
Message-ID: <0EA62222FA4FB8838276D39C@scan.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <LV-SVRi6bdVJWrGW6Ex000002d3@lv-svr.lumenvox.com>
References: <LV-SVRi6bdVJWrGW6Ex000002d3@lv-svr.lumenvox.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: List of standards
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ea4ac80f790299f943f0a53be7e1a21a
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


--On Wednesday, 18 August, 2004 10:03 -0700 Thomas Gal
<ThomasGal@LumenVox.com> wrote:

> Actually if you knew what it meant but weren't that familiar
> with the place of an RFC(someone who's read 2 specs or
> something) you would assume IMHO that an "Internet Standard"
> is NOT a "request for comments". 

Sigh.  If this is the issue, could someone please initiate a
request to the IESG or Secretariat to change that link to read
"Internet Standards Index and RFC Materials" or something to
that effect (please take the wordsmithing offline too).   This
particular issue does not seem to justify bandwidth or
fine-tuning on this list.  

Really.

     john
   





_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status