RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-08.txt> (Rate Measurement Test Protocol Problem Statement) to Informational RFC

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[e-mail]>]

Looks good. Thanks for addressing my concerns. 

Regards,

Dan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gen-art [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of MORTON,
> ALFRED C (AL)
> Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2015 1:33 AM
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-08.txt> (Rate
> Measurement Test Protocol Problem Statement) to Informational RFC
> 
> Ben, Dan, Greg,
> 
> Version 09 of -ippm-rate-problem draft addresses your comments to great
> extent.
> 
> Although Ben's (GEN-ART) suggestion to clarify the figure in the Intro was
> adopted, it seems reasonable to leave out the Figure numbers since the two
> figures are referenced one time each and they are only 3 lines high (so not
> likely to move far, if at all).
> 
> Dan's (OPS-DIR) comments have been addressed (following e-mail
> exchange) by inserting a new section on Operational Considerations where
> we have compromised on the text.
> 
> Greg's comments have been addressed to the extent possible without re-
> visiting the "Toronto compromise" which only involved section 5.
> Other comments cite WG agreements that have not actually been discussed
> AFAIK, or refer to purely OPTIONAL features in the memo.
> 
> regards,
> Al
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: IETF-Announce [[e-mail]] On Behalf Of The
> IESG [[e-mail]]
> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 9:43 AM
> To: IETF-Announce
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-08.txt> (Rate Measurement
> Test Protocol Problem Statement) to Informational RFC
> 
> The IESG has received a request from the IP Performance Metrics WG (ippm)
> to consider the following document:
> - 'Rate Measurement Test Protocol Problem Statement'
>   <draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-08.txt> as Informational RFC
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> [e-mail] mailing lists by 2014-12-22. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to [e-mail] instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of
> the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> Abstract
> 
> 
>    This memo presents an access rate-measurement problem statement for
>    test protocols to measure IP Performance Metrics.  The rate
>    measurement scenario has wide-spread attention of Internet access
>    subscribers and seemingly all industry players, including regulators.
>    Key test protocol aspects require the ability to control packet size
>    on the tested path and enable asymmetrical packet size testing in a
>    controller-responder architecture.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-
> 3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dippm-2Drate-
> 2Dproblem_&d=AwICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNX
> CJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=EKLRXCpGDaNYiJ9WjJgA2LRIdn0QDiC
> yaT1frtYfg8Y&s=TnJHba-sAmj9BdGxYeMgYS-qoQBHT0QgbNSFjZ8snbo&e=
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-
> 3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dippm-2Drate-
> 2Dproblem_ballot_&d=AwICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR3
> 1OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=EKLRXCpGDaNYiJ9WjJgA2LRIdn
> 0QDiCyaT1frtYfg8Y&s=8MzkfnznQ4g4XC4ZfldXKZFpASLAK89Cf4ELdsZWIZ0&e
> =
> 
> 
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_gen-
> 2Dart&d=AwICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvl
> siLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=EKLRXCpGDaNYiJ9WjJgA2LRIdn0QDiCyaT1frt
> Yfg8Y&s=Q8ccS1OgnV3UQ8TqslGmcf_Dz8hcuFK1jGvVfV6os7c&e=