Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps]

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Sun, 28 December 2014 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECD51AD68D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 13:35:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.141
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p4SQr-ulJzp0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 13:35:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B71E1AD68A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 13:35:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (unknown [50.189.173.0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09A4B8A031 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 21:35:44 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 16:35:42 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps]
Message-ID: <20141228213541.GD51125@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <5614C286-0CD2-4DAD-A846-510EE38D1B9A@ietf.org> <549DAE1C.5080400@gmail.com> <54A02C8A.3020707@qti.qualcomm.com> <54A04CDC.8020009@dcrocker.net> <54A05568.705@gmail.com> <20141228201401.GB24442@localhost> <54A07420.2030507@dcrocker.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <54A07420.2030507@dcrocker.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/D_nU6l2x481mA3lOdhGN2gqmy6M
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 21:35:46 -0000

On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 01:20:32PM -0800, Dave Crocker wrote:
> approach the design of changes with caution -- starting with some
> modesty about expected benefits -- and make on-going evaluations, to
> look for those consequences and consider tweaks.

I think that's right, and it's again a reason that I prefer Nico's
approach -- not because I think it will be simpler; but rather
because, since it is such a departure, nobody will be tempted to think
that it'll get everything right in one pass.

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com