IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: tone policing

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Tue, 03 September 2019 01:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382F01200D8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 18:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IAKq3RDLLBT9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 18:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C9072120058 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 18:32:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 18160 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2019 01:20:03 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 3 Sep 2019 01:20:03 -0000
Subject: Re: tone policing
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <964a7d97-f146-4d2e-aa3e-d39fc08f6f76@Mikes-IPhone> <20190901195210.GA27269@kduck.mit.edu> <f4a03464-9c9d-9ee5-088a-586e2bb326b1@comcast.net> <4100d3fa-3bba-41dc-3df2-bf2d3dc0f667@network-heretics.com> <6abdd246-6ac0-7369-35b8-e299373eee64@gmail.com> <3a707945-2a88-66a1-f5c0-006fae1c77c6@network-heretics.com> <B21A8972-C958-4468-9C2E-73E1773B1C91@mnot.net> <554e5b8f-c373-c9ef-c64f-100ed05f0e3f@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <cf2569e2-04f4-4881-9b15-cfd949b01ae6@network-heretics.com>
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <c63e746c-cb4c-a2ca-340d-831a7e178cd1@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 10:32:24 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <cf2569e2-04f4-4881-9b15-cfd949b01ae6@network-heretics.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/DcF_Z8vhq93SX4J85yiOwenjVL0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 01:32:29 -0000

Keith Moore wrote:

 > what kinds of behavior really are harmful to IETF

Not reading the draft, of course.

>> >    We understand that this style of communication was accepted (if
>> >    not encouraged) in the past, but it is no longer the expectation
>> >    now.
> 
> Assuming there was nothing else in the message that gave specific 
> guidance, this does appear to be the very kind of abuse I'm opposed to.

There is none.

When police arrests a suspect by warrant, the warrant describes
which code the suspect acted against.

						Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email