IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 31 March 2020 19:08 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0973A27DA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H9zXNQ4uw3ZS for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D98003A27A5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:08:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 02VJ2PDR009024; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:07:42 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=8UFUZXIEFS3h0+bzxUvcHxXw33ZLYA1ZoN5IKmKWUCs=; b=aVxFLjUOLI7LmYOMSUDeoIF78yo+qoli3BCCxySt8b0a9ahHk8CBxteYmg4kO7wRRPZf 7fME19gqNcZ9xj6cQm04OaMER9iIH6WExLdSoYUZ9kTzKX9TObyBaNJ8J38z3aLEcKDi GFiziGS76OtbB2nHBAsY8eaOF9IC59D2HXmUCeYo12m6POnE+BdPLjUE+hYK9OXHo4Kg tKNuNLdn+M23eoRKnBykUPfTOY+q1nIh27zNPwDuCfWK8gSXsaDGBwck0oQmn9O3P3kL gG+gjX/VUcuoPjkH+b5yaKZjq3sXuw490rueYvKnWkPD4r3XGqbaGwQah/NdOT5djRDw fA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint8 (prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com [96.6.114.122] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 301xqbpneq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:07:41 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 02VIlPvS013397; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:07:40 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.116]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3028djc1jf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:07:39 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.121) by ustx2ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.124) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:07:38 -0700
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.121]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.121]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:07:31 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
CC: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
Thread-Topic: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
Thread-Index: AQHV+T17YIte9GVOtUSJhAMBWIG3LKhaRrUAgAhDeoCAAA0YgIAA1WyAgAAJDYCAAAPigIAAAfkAgAAC7YD//78KAA==
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 19:07:31 +0000
Message-ID: <FF1DEA22-337B-4DF0-A81F-0B121A46775E@akamai.com>
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVAhfFLYwzqw6Qch3BpuMvqjZPzFJ5o1iTOwR+yqH8j-Aw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCzMPGuunYZBCSh90ddY2kKJ_Hqnot0s1jmhNQ7qT0xkg@mail.gmail.com> <89730DD8-0451-4658-A0CD-83A85E2055FE@episteme.net> <0C31D020-46FA-424E-8FFD-64BBE8F952E9@cooperw.in> <1E702B62-9982-48F2-B8D6-F4F80A8DE168@episteme.net> <20200331184236.GT18021@localhost> <CALaySJ+_+-kf+3nta8LwMiwPmqPmRdOgC7KAnDfeDgx0ThVa-w@mail.gmail.com> <20200331185954.GU18021@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20200331185954.GU18021@localhost>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.35.20030802
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.118.63]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <89A79740A48DC549B8CBD0A9D371ECEA@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-03-31_07:2020-03-31, 2020-03-31 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=663 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2002250000 definitions=main-2003310157
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-03-31_07:2020-03-31, 2020-03-31 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=655 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2003310159
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Dd6sg3mhywIfLu7bld-GAGSVAFg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 19:08:58 -0000

>    My preference is still for the IESG submitting an I-D and Last Calling
    it, and I exhort the IESG to do that.
  
I guess someone who prefers to see unjustifiable process breakage can file an appeal and will hopefully get the reasoning.

I see no justification to break the process, but at best will just co-sign an appeal.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email