IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Some thoughts about draft-leiba-3777upd-eligibility-02.txt

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 21 August 2012 22:44 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D60821F85A4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.008
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.031, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ChiemleIxbXw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 785AA21F85A5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vcbfo14 with SMTP id fo14so392988vcb.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=my6SHs9AfVoNr0jT/3DRAqsQzYHwBd2VNzpCTm9ro4Y=; b=GbGk9PIOABvjPAf+/0gNt6HWisVvyK9YwgT7wFH7HQMBINMoGvm0LVbTF1tefUvGcp 7Va4+oYTmMkOR/XE++WDrLKVihotJAwjFfP1xq60EcDH3G3m8ZoZvNo6EgoqmooJS2L8 0y1VSB5dzIIVWUwef5rU+jMWxpMoSDcJq7Q22qI8jOcyOGreYugG8gZPWhFnA9y3/R+G nlDM1hCTQeUhmQzuE/gSePKHoUSjS+bXc8y1quM88ShRWxMjJLIxukY1c8roM529hk6V q4HEPkm8NQTPkdAkknjfqW9TmCKQ+dqysbT7lN6pEFRCh9kcpDfzBzcFvxBVY/aXR4CF wQIQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.95.165 with SMTP id dl5mr185607vdb.23.1345589042797; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.58.58.41 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7FE6283A-6066-497B-9767-3E09D18F952B@gmail.com>
References: <133201cd7f85$325f59a0$971e0ce0$@olddog.co.uk> <ABDF3549-3C24-4AD5-985C-5E1560A80D83@gmail.com> <CALaySJ+nogfk2n8u10PyaBLOhytnsXtB7Cj+DNBFaO7r4BJ3Jg@mail.gmail.com> <7FE6283A-6066-497B-9767-3E09D18F952B@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:44:02 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: hlLRAkniyq-UATVoHPAybY5pQ1Y
Message-ID: <CALaySJJ7-LGXribUKJ-HX6Wkp-SSr8dezEmsz-bbdsapWDcVMA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Some thoughts about draft-leiba-3777upd-eligibility-02.txt
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: draft-leiba-3777upd-eligibility@tools.ietf.org, adrian@olddog.co.uk, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 22:44:04 -0000

>> In particular: should bullet 15,2 (and its supporting text elsewhere)
>> be removed?
>
> 15,2 should probably say "People employed in the IETF Secretariat….".
>
> I would leave it in.  My thinking is that the IESG, IAB, and IAOC have oversight
> roles over the Secretariat and RFC Editor.  Having people employed by these
> organizations be directly involved in the selection of the IESG, IAB, and IAOC
> would be odd.

Yes, that was the intent of having it in.  The devil, though, is in the details.

Do others have wisdom to add here?

Barry

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status