Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director

Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com> Thu, 07 March 2013 15:23 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCAB821F8D66 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 07:23:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.274
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.274 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.325, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tN7l1sXloDY6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 07:23:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtv-iport-2.cisco.com (mtv-iport-2.cisco.com [173.36.130.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C2F21F8D62 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 07:23:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1818; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1362669824; x=1363879424; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=DtgIcF62ekNd9ii74/7yWAVGgA96QRTxzGaKFnuKHgg=; b=XE5rj/CZgbopV79OshRWK+wFpcZND9bttf9QHJ97yqIcpxL38wuLpedM CxzlmHSAjQ9ryoijaWHsBnsQ/PFjkXGALE4LNqEprsqfMPMDhrAc0tSNm SALgOPofNCABmuxueEmnmkrUopS2bbBBd//BJKquSqfM3rVHeptPpgDpl Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EALCwOFGrRDoJ/2dsb2JhbABDxEiBYRZzgiwBAQEEOj8QCw4EBgklDwU1FBMUh366eo8MB4JfYQOIbIobg0MBkHGDKg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,803,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="74579402"
Received: from mtv-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.58.9]) by mtv-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2013 15:23:43 +0000
Received: from mcast-linux1.cisco.com (mcast-linux1.cisco.com [172.27.244.121]) by mtv-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r27FNSDB000644 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Mar 2013 15:23:28 GMT
Received: from mcast-linux1.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by mcast-linux1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r27FLb2s026862; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 07:21:52 -0800
Received: (from eckert@localhost) by mcast-linux1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id r27FLaj0026861; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 07:21:36 -0800
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 07:21:36 -0800
From: Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>
To: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@lilacglade.org>
Subject: Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director
Message-ID: <20130307152136.GC24221@cisco.com>
References: <5134D5A0.4050209@gmail.com> <tsllia3m5lh.fsf@mit.edu> <5134F720.5010507@cisco.com> <tsl1ubvlywt.fsf@mit.edu> <CAHBDyN6AM-_b2HMrmmQQVuhxFc-_Rfpfg0=r38mkcJ4zqoJeTw@mail.gmail.com> <tslr4julxmh.fsf@mit.edu> <1C1C0842-BF6A-4A3F-A312-35CF0A994793@lilacglade.org> <BDCCFB12-1F2C-44BD-867A-92E5745F3D39@vigilsec.com> <7B6FDB89-F360-45B6-8240-F2F9F81ABAA7@vigilsec.com> <9292FB65-9842-4C95-9284-15F1E9ECEE1D@lilacglade.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9292FB65-9842-4C95-9284-15F1E9ECEE1D@lilacglade.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 15:23:46 -0000

Btw: RFC3777 3.7.2 seems to define only the criteria to be applied by 
NomCom, not for the confirming body. 

On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:21:41AM -0500, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> 
> Hi Russ,
> 
> On Mar 5, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> > The rest of your question ought to be discussed at the TSVAREA meeting in Orlando.
> 
> I have looked at the agenda of the TSV Area Open Meeting (on Wednesday from 9:00am to 11:30am), and it includes the following item:
> 
> "- Open Mic about "Area Expectations for the TSV ADs" -- 60 minutes
> The questions we will ask the community:
>   - what is the existing description we gave to NomCom.
>   - does the community agree with it?
>   - is it reasonable, or are we asking too much?"
> 
> By "description we gave to the NomCom" do you mean the IESG's list of desired criteria?  Is the NomCom also going to report on the criteria that they came up with, after considering the IESG's input and whatever input they received from the community?
> 
> I am a little bit confused about the purpose of this meeting.  Is it for the IESG to get feedback on their desired criteria, so that those criteria could potentially be updated for future years?  Or is it for the nomcom to get further information from the community in order to determine the actual criteria the nomcom will use (based on input from both the IESG and the community) to fill the open TSV AD position this year?
> 
> I would like to know the purpose of the meeting, because I believe it would be appropriate for me to participate in a discussion of the former topic, but not the latter.
> 
> Margaret
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
---
Toerless Eckert, eckert@cisco.com
Cisco NSSTG Systems & Technology Architecture
SDN: Let me play with the network, mommy!