Re: The Next Generation

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 11 September 2019 18:26 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8241209FA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=Tc1HjH8t; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=HYloht4W
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25ttszIsa5h6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910A712080D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.178.124]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id x8BIQJ67014318 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:26:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1568226392; x=1568312792; bh=TLqgwPBITj/ED8hlnvGa/vwRqnBWfH2vcjsJnFSQ+cI=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Tc1HjH8trKn497ST5z5tpluAAvvFiWubabwMwNfRJM+SikgnopjkDVUA19EvH24Qr AIZl47ZAU27d++DiCz/mwnk2K3lFD+G0vA8v4zKOr64jbctjR5TJuVdB6vblVvWCFp xpjGF2/+iDJDHz5/ZYxFp82lsbOReNqZe5q/cp8I=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1568226392; x=1568312792; i=@elandsys.com; bh=TLqgwPBITj/ED8hlnvGa/vwRqnBWfH2vcjsJnFSQ+cI=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=HYloht4WijGO8vICbT58jTfHNOxndCQ/aZ9AKWYqs0rKt3TVRehXCKywY7eJj2xD4 2muL9fy2JrVNGpfRMosg+7JU1R3ay7DU4ZwNknbhOwtwIZpX7GiFRomxP9mW63rHdl Mnf9QSNFGvo3AZO70S+zdOIsKOVDS1IVb61VMcgo=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20190911094010.0c933fa8@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:22:39 -0700
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: The Next Generation
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6Sz3j0iLGsB2bGvfitPzCkiTCJYHfmUF5S-8zPYMt1r+3A@mail.g mail.com>
References: <CAChr6Sz3j0iLGsB2bGvfitPzCkiTCJYHfmUF5S-8zPYMt1r+3A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/DiuTDTGok5Cb_vrv8d7EcC1rf8w>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 18:26:38 -0000

Hi Rob,
At 05:35 PM 03-09-2019, Rob Sayre wrote:
>I noticed there were some parts of the last IETF meeting (105) that 
>were sparsely attended. And, the attendees of those meetings tended 
>to be [removed]. There's nothing wrong with that: no one chooses 
>their [removed].
>
>Although there is value in experience, maybe the IETF should work to 
>hand off some duties to more diverse younger people.
>
>As a start, I propose identifying some current groups that could be 
>better-handled by

My reading of the relevant rules is that the message which I am 
sending is off-topic for this mailing list.  For what it is worth, 
one of the points in your message (re. newcomers) was discussed [1] 
on this mailing list about a decade ago.

There has been various proposals over the years about 
newcomers.  Those proposals do not set a metric for success.  Some 
time ago, I chose a number as part of an effort to get new people 
interested in working for free.  I reached half that number at the 
end of that endeavor.  Based on that, I would describe the venture as 
a failure.

The person selecting people for the various roles is the Area 
Director.  It is his/her responsibility to assess whether the Area is 
attracting new people and whether there aren't any obstacles which 
prevent or discourage those new people from staying around.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

1. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/SEoPG4pfQVqTtidnvBx5myNcUCU