Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 09 April 2016 14:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B819E12B007 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 07:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.42
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.42 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=0.379, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sOSbKmZ1uZeA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 07:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D740B12B004 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 07:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id v188so43304571wme.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 07:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ipOWEW0KzRgsYgGttqiN/bANd6SuMyOFWrMwrREebQo=; b=bvkgAZl95fg644wYjjBxJMe1ADM9Qa+PaBLcLx+SUhPVmRaJTGPbNTxIPsZnCd1udF rbhUT2gR0hpUxpJxSPY/Lq4tePin/8+Q3OH2vJBsXJAFbiAUPmsK+EwDxqOpdOs3foIB cRq9nVbc9UFkLHmHT1WkIpO268exkl2NAslRWtipAOBghIzjcUpX2pc8ZdpUUhy8k6Vb XRkycnV+Der3G26LW4aYZNyM9IletquCypOuSI133qdMEvW4D1jNcP4A6aSHLoHr7Sdu T/3RfvKW5MlvuCYtFksWLM4zaBrqQjM8MTbfLJOTVAaLnj+qVNZnO6AUbGKqjPJJDVMD Iqeg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ipOWEW0KzRgsYgGttqiN/bANd6SuMyOFWrMwrREebQo=; b=J8Wle0Ute5SmrRFm7UIyfa172URQOFFVibzrLcYThIGInR5KF9W6+DoaLMWQhljZOd d9LPf4+YV5MxnTIqu4IPHj1wNqOEMlbkCvUAKqcGca0NsDtykZKbmwHezHYKJbXhLjad fFCISrXKukiDEz/EuxLsf67yhpqAzwxOWaVGtVx06vNJbNBmARTsHBiQKUpR/VInSkhd sHmfGagm7X5GGH94CTQZwnwlc9lR3jrZaBSE6nLo0akIeYQC/J3OHHI5QSv4AEqincuR J/NByuFLEma26H+DjpYo6CTqkgx6BTmwsN59t+WTyZGm/yGGDmjYBNDikdsh/JZgH33M GevQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKmH8QJ+TH2Cg4agVh+jjBGOgBuxTj9t0kEY1lgPj6azDUyMSCBf0N7eQZ7uT7OkA==
X-Received: by 10.28.183.213 with SMTP id h204mr9159639wmf.96.1460213134243; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 07:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.81.8.143] ([195.76.232.154]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lh1sm18508042wjb.20.2016.04.09.07.45.33 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Apr 2016 07:45:33 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp-00.txt
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <570882CE.9010501@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 16:45:32 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <092739B8-1D35-4539-961A-EDAC7033218A@gmail.com>
References: <20160408185636.23101.86017.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <570882CE.9010501@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Do4MwbolKBkmA0kseAi72iQAXaA>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 14:45:40 -0000

On 9 Apr 2016, at 6:19 AM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> I do think one possible outcome needs to be added:
> 
>   X.  That the results of the experiment suggest that the changes made
>       in Section 2 are damaging and should not be applied again;
> 
> I regard this as unlikely, but I disagree with the comment that the
> experiment is bound to succeed. I can think of a number of failure
> scenarios, several of which would cause the NomCom chair to abort
> the process.

My comment was that anything short of a disaster is bound to be considered a success. IOW an outcome that is somewhat worse than the current situation will be indistinguishable from success.

Yoav