Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[e-mail]>]

There is no such migration, it is transition and coexistence, and if you think in how much took to reach the actual IPv4 levels of penetration, it still makes sense. We are in the right path.

 

Anything else that we could try, will mean wasting more time and resources and money from those that already moved to IPv6 or are in their way, that we don’t have.

 

Regards,

Jordi

@jordipalet

 

 

 

El 20/2/20 11:33, "ietf en nombre de Khaled Omar" <[e-mail] en nombre de [e-mail]> escribió:

 

Regardless the different %s, lets take the average one, it can not make us optimistic and stop thinking about a better solution, we should learn from the long time passed without full migration occured, if we will wait till that happens, the division will occur which is not good for the internet, lets welcome new ideas and give it the space, time, and opportunity fairly, if it will be good then welcome, if not, trash is made for this. 

Get Outlook for Android

 

From: ietf <[e-mail]> on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2020 2:00:58 AM
To: IETF Rinse Repeat <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence. 

 

And you're missing several points about how those stats are looked at.

The % in the stats shown by google/others is only what they can measure, but they can't measure *all*. There are countries (big ones) that don't allow measurements, or at least the same level of details, and however, are doing massive IPv6 deployments.

All the CDNs and caches have IPv6. The customers that have those caches and enable IPv6 for their subscribers, are getting ranges over 65%, sometimes even up to 85-90% of IPv6 traffic when mainly the subscribers are householders instead of big enterprises.

Also, the google (and others) measurements, show average worldwide, but if you look to many countries they have even surpassed the 50% or so.

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
 
 

El 20/2/20 5:38, "ietf en nombre de Khaled Omar" <[e-mail] en nombre de [e-mail]> escribió:

    Since long time I was observing this, still almost the same, no clear progress occurred.
    
    Thanks,
    
    Khaled Omar
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Scott O. Bradner <[e-mail]> 
    Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2020 8:11 PM
    To: Khaled Omar <[e-mail]>
    Cc: IETF Rinse Repeat <[e-mail]>
    Subject: Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
    
    Quite a few folk are already there - see https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html
    
    Scott
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.





**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.