IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [92all] IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Tue, 24 February 2015 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE641A87C9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:10:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RyIsxDqdsqjZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:10:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F8C21A890E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:10:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18F7FDA01F8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:10:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-03.win.nominum.com [64.89.235.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C289053E0B1; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:10:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from CAS-04.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (64.89.235.67) by CAS-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (64.89.235.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:10:02 -0800
Received: from [10.0.20.107] (71.233.43.215) by CAS-04.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:10:02 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: [92all] IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <8DB221D1-5AEC-4BB9-A44B-E326B9AE8FF4@juniper.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:09:53 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <A9B04584-D55B-4249-BDBE-B3497321A886@nominum.com>
References: <20150224170152.6224.60832.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <DBC7E705-B163-46E8-AC9B-97BDC33E7C68@apple.com> <54ECBC5E.2030001@dcrocker.net> <CAHw9_iKpmEOFyZ5Mi=6KcsEoLHDVCwFTi5q_0GfK-d5B1X_Hdg@mail.gmail.com> <7E5194B1-4717-4225-85C6-E969EF7800A7@apple.com> <D1120FE3.3E483%eckelcu@cisco.com> <54ECDDA0.6010904@dcrocker.net> <8DB221D1-5AEC-4BB9-A44B-E326B9AE8FF4@juniper.net>
To: Dean Bogdanovic <deanb@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Originating-IP: [71.233.43.215]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/DzFWoKHcd_oYYxMMah21Y4H4bvQ>
Cc: "dcrocker@bbiw.net" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:10:05 -0000

On Feb 24, 2015, at 3:55 PM, Dean Bogdanovic <deanb@juniper.net> wrote:
> I agree with Tom's statement that there is too much corporate marketing around this hackathon.

I see the Cisco logo once, Cisco mentioned one other time, and Cisco DevNet mentioned one other time, on the event details page.   This is similar to the presentation of the Google and Time Warner logos on the meeting page.   I don't work for Cisco, and indeed the company I work for used to count Cisco as one of our major competitors, yet I do not find the "corporate marketing" for this event objectionable.

I hate to extend this conversation, because I think it's incredibly weird how much opprobrium has been expressed, but can you explain precisely what it is that you object to about the supposed corporate marketing of which you speak?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email