Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Fri, 10 May 2019 01:29 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDEC8120047 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2019 18:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i78qP86Z7cLL for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2019 18:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F7C0120045 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 May 2019 18:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 42849 invoked from network); 10 May 2019 01:18:48 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 10 May 2019 01:18:48 -0000
Subject: Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful
To: Lloyd Wood <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C89F024CD3@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com> <CALaySJJDHg5j9Z7+noS=YXoNROqdsbJ6coEECtLtbJ6fWJ3xsQ@mail.gmail.com> <53a9c16c-163c-a18a-371a-f8aa8697af15@cs.tcd.ie> <865c2730-8bb1-c373-38e4-82be30866340@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <41369029.10409625.1557392178451@mail.yahoo.com>
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <368eb46e-932f-bdc8-90b0-00b70a4da123@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 10:29:24 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <41369029.10409625.1557392178451@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/E-PXwmgPR3jmdhUCUxhVoOD_7BQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 01:29:26 -0000

Lloyd Wood wrote:

> if we’re post Postel, and have seen the end of the end-to-end principle, what’s left?

Don't mind as the end to end principle holds valid forever.

Those who think otherwise do not understand the principle (e.g.
the original paper includes examples of the principle applicable
to telephone networks).

Moreover, inapplicability of Postel's principle for relays does
not cause any interoperability problems if the original sender
is conservative and the final receiver is aggressive.

						Masataka Ohta

> On Wednesday, May 8, 2019, 16:30, Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote:
> 
> It is merely that Postel's principle is not applicable to
> relays, which sends what it accepts without modification.
> 
>                  Masataka Ohta