Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)

Geoff Mulligan <geoff@proto6.com> Thu, 09 August 2012 05:26 UTC

Return-Path: <geoff@proto6.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8142F11E811E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 22:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.973
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.973 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.230, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Rx+7lkeJyAw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 22:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.coslabs.com (mail.coslabs.com [199.233.92.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AB911E80F7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 22:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.36] (unknown [184.99.9.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.coslabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BBBE5F76C; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 12:46:50 -0600 (MDT)
References: <31BCE4DE825B3F4D9E452EFBBD3F1EF2834A0516@PACDCEXMB01.cable.comcast.com> <502169E9.9020009@dcrocker.net> <AC30AAA7-8634-4851-86CC-6F64095BB600@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|0ebd669a4eccc2cca00daf1beb84ed50o76MuX03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|AC30AAA7-8634-4851-86CC-6F64095BB600@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <39C56E09-72AD-4C99-9A62-3992DEF04D70@shinkuro.com> <01af01cd74f5$217e5770$647b0650$@us> <5021CDDE.8060207@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1208071937500.20339@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1208071937500.20339@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <B33DB90A-5819-4CEE-AE99-DAEC5CC5425C@proto6.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206)
From: Geoff Mulligan <geoff@proto6.com>
Subject: Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 12:46:55 -0600
To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:38:01 -0700
Cc: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>, "dcrocker@bbiw.net" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 05:26:06 -0000

So then why not consider, London, Paris (not the Concorde Lafayette), Frankfurt, Amsterdam?





On Aug 7, 2012, at 8:55 PM, Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> wrote:

> 
> You said about Prague:
> 
> "...[do] folks who live outside of that region not care about the 
> additional hop of travel to get to it?"
> 
> This gets cited often, and I don't really understand why. There are 
> VERY few European cities that are reachable directly from the US (or 
> Asia for that matter). Most require transiting some kind of major hub 
> (London, Paris, Frankfurt, Amsterdam to name a few). There will always 
> be exceptions, I am sure you can get to Stockholm directly from the US 
> East Coast, but not from the West Coast. I am sure a very large 
> percentage of the IETF attendees from the US went through London or 
> Frankfurt (or a small number of alternatives) to get to Stockholm on 
> the two occasions when we met there.
> 
> Since I travel to Norway on a more or less regular basis, I am used to 
> (and quite happy to) go through Frankfurt or London, it's just a fact 
> of life especially if you factor in the "preferred carrier" (personal 
> or corporate). Prague may be an "extra hop," but depending on 
> schedules you might well get to your destination (hotel) just as 
> quickly as you would for getting from CDG to central Paris or LHR to 
> central London.
> 
> If we restrict European cities to the ones with direct flight 
> connections from other continents, we're really limiting the choices. 
> Let's be a little more realistic and consider actual travel "pain" 
> from the top hubs in Europe, assuming we can't (always) meet in those 
> places.
> 
> I do understand that the extra hop does add some cost, which is why
> I always consider trains as a reasonable alternative, albeit not a
> particularly fast one. For example, the cost for a First Class train
> ticket from Frankfurt to Prague was 98 Euros. I am not suggesting
> that this is always going to be a reasonable alternative, and I am
> worried that the mere mention of "train" on this list may result in
> a flame war, but still...
> 
> Ole
> 
> 
> 
> Ole J. Jacobsen
> Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
> Cisco Systems
> Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
> E-mail: ole@cisco.com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj
> Skype: organdemo
> 
>