Re: Realistic responses to DMARC
Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Wed, 21 December 2016 17:38 UTC
Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B961294C0
for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:38:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=cridland.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id PuSEnijq6Lxp for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:38:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x234.google.com (mail-qt0-x234.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::234])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B92CB129503
for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:38:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x234.google.com with SMTP id n6so212864187qtd.1
for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:38:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cridland.net; s=google;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=V40HEMIXU/TrTf9M83HV/4pEaWsJTkvr16h+HqerMOA=;
b=BolNmo8+B5RdAbWPstm9kAop4iHMqCv/nWOH3hoBacM6/bOjUM47z9NJ0TqzDnQUW6
Tz2ESxtQLhRuiNbtSjPwHB8orc3Z3elzYvGmCeXxb7KWSKYFyESC6AyWRKa0GgAY+sTy
EZZgncEZQ4MaXPLsgpEmp7OtspaoxUztnXiRg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=V40HEMIXU/TrTf9M83HV/4pEaWsJTkvr16h+HqerMOA=;
b=Sw6wJLUz8z4zmhdsagv3JL6cRi9WDiFDD+n33uM77GWpKmIEjVQ7VN9BnF0q2iZC1L
8bgv8EYatYuitxSU/f0o6CMEhjpi78/TtcV41fxnJcL9gRThK+PuUxoz3Yu6nB63+P2m
jrmryNJFMfFoDoqiZm+d1uPepmS3uuNBlS/OjgnYo6iGk0KHqzDdaTrOo1aFMT+5n8HH
2K6mUQ2mZvi5lo+FRF9ATKBAqQvEGJbBkn9ul6ZC6HQTTZt+UvAFO+VRAApECt3wD4ld
GZs5mhtRB2IOmpN6Iy+/0ifUEpgCOt7mEvYFMrW/RB0bdr/AWGMLCuc2mS0tCTooG9lB
IusA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXI4wyWKDQgt/USDeI5ahbnVGgwBHJPwETyGyhc4o5uf2E2zi2iPDUcNJmzkRzdFNpI3DWDb50VI11hUq83a
X-Received: by 10.200.55.23 with SMTP id o23mr6284073qtb.185.1482341891833;
Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:38:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.134.69 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:38:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <e9e9efd0-0d83-63f3-4deb-8e0633cc0d17@isode.com>
References: <9AD6AAD6812D3B9F8379226B@PSB> <20161218022823.8779.qmail@ary.lan>
<20161218055834.he6gkupqp5xqlvml@thunk.org>
<alpine.OSX.2.11.1612180101460.14297@ary.qy>
<20161218065905.5g66jgkvtckydmry@thunk.org>
<alpine.OSX.2.11.1612180215450.14970@ary.qy>
<20161218222427.7phtcg7mhpypcwnb@thunk.org>
<499b8679-37bc-36eb-3ac8-9d99570f42df@dcrocker.net>
<alpine.OSX.2.11.1612181857510.19758@ary.qy>
<20161219005411.w5tmps5i46lnkydy@thunk.org>
<13804.1482113481@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
<e9e9efd0-0d83-63f3-4deb-8e0633cc0d17@isode.com>
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:38:11 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKHUCzyi2jHekkaWHHOwntRNKcXpWkNfO90TZoSHEiENP9_BHg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Realistic responses to DMARC
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1139821ce69cd705442e9dbf
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/E2Cp_Pp-RtBgvj9g6UhN4IVBJWc>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>,
IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>,
<mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
<mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:38:15 -0000
On 21 December 2016 at 16:23, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote: > don't rehash the DMARC discussion all over again. > Do you even know what this list is *for*? Dave.
- DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC rel… Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Yoav Nir
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Paul Wouters
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Dave Crocker
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Paul Wouters
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… ned+ietf
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Randy Bush
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… S Moonesamy
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Yoav Nir
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Randy Bush
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Ted Lemon
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Ted Lemon
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… S Moonesamy
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… John C Klensin
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… John C Klensin
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC John Levine
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… John Levine
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Dave Crocker
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC John C Klensin
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC John R Levine
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC John R Levine
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… S Moonesamy
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Dave Crocker
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… John C Klensin
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… John C Klensin
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Andrew G. Malis
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… John Levine
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Dave Crocker
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC John R Levine
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Theodore Ts'o
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… John R Levine
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Michael Richardson
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Yoav Nir
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman --- [LEDE-DEV] DMARC… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: DMARC methods in mailman Hector Santos
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Dave Cridland
- Re: Realistic responses to DMARC Ted Lemon