Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code...

["Martin J. Dürst" <[e-mail]>]

One of the advantages of a standards organization such as the IETF is 
cross-concern review. For the IETF, one very strong cross-concern is 
security. Another one (also for my personally) is internationalization. 
Another, more vague one, is general architecture. Early running code is 
very often (not always) characterized by the fact that such 
cross-concerns are actively or passively ignored.

I had a look at your draft and checked for "security" and 
"internationalization", but only found the former, and not not in a 
discussion about how this proposal would make sure that cross-concerns 
are adequately addressed.

Regards,   Martin.

On 2012/12/02 5:12, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've just posted an idea [1] for a small process improvement.
> If it doesn't seem crazy I'll try pursue it with the IESG as
> an RFC 3933 process experiment. If its universally hated then
> that's fine, it can die.
>
> The IESG have seen (more-or-less) this already but it hasn't
> be discussed, so this is just a proposal from me and has no
> "official" status whatsoever.
>
> Any comments, suggestions or better ideas are very welcome.
> Feel free to send me comments off list for now, or on this
> list I guess. If there's loads of email (always possible,
> this being a process thing;-) we can move to some other list.
>
> Regards,
> Stephen.
>
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-farrell-ft
>