Re: [Iasa20] Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 21 September 2018 22:57 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966F5130EFC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 15:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3HUUiYpr8ewu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 15:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76AFE130EFB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 15:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 71259 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2018 22:57:51 -0000
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 21 Sep 2018 22:57:51 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1AB97200529099; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:57:50 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:57:50 -0400
Message-Id: <20180921225751.1AB97200529099@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: iasa20@ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice
In-Reply-To: <153756470188.20283.12048259576780413892.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/EAwhAta0IlwzTP5onLYei11Z5Qc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 22:58:02 -0000

In article <153756470188.20283.12048259576780413892.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> you write:
>The IESG has received a request from the IETF Administrative Support Activity
>2 WG (iasa2) to consider the following document: - 'Update to the Selection
>of Trustees for the IETF Trust'
>  <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> as Best Current Practice

This is ready to go.  Separating oversight of the trust from the
business management of the IETF would be a good idea even if the
demise of the IAOC didn't force us to do it.

I believe that the trustees (of whom I am one) are agreeable.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly