Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review

"Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com> Mon, 28 March 2016 11:01 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@sobco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C2F12D856 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 04:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rTmDK4tGECif for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 04:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sobco.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.164]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD61012D15E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 04:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29D31A065DB; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:01:51 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sobco.com
Received: from sobco.sobco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sobco.sobco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dzxfOHM506w9; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:01:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from golem.sobco.com (golem.sobco.com [136.248.127.162]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A622C1A065CD; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:01:49 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review
From: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20160328021617.0e0a0e08@resistor.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:01:49 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A478CA0A-44F4-409A-A561-B1B4F0BF9F6D@sobco.com>
References: <20160316170239.30920.41218.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160318005648.0e552fc8@resistor.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20160328021617.0e0a0e08@resistor.net>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/EEnmmQNmMYtk_haryEewccmWjzY>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 11:01:58 -0000

sorry, I was waiting for the end of the comment period to address the comments/questions
in case one person’s questions or comments elicited mailing list discussions

the comment period is ending soon and we will be reviewing the responses to the call for review 
and getting back to the community at that time.

Scott

> On Mar 28, 2016, at 6:36 AM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Tobias,
> 
> The IAOC solicited community input about a proposed IETF Privacy Policy [1] on 16 March.  I sent an email on 18 March in which I asked a few questions [2].  I neither received any answers to those questions nor did I find any answers in the ietf@ietf.org mailing list archive.  I tried to find out whether there were any answers in the IAOC minutes.  I could not find any (published) minutes for January or February.
> 
> I would appreciate if you could bring those questions to the attention of the IAOC and provide the answers.
> 
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
> 
> 1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg97181.html
> 2. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg97207.html
>