Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent

Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com> Tue, 31 August 2010 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3322C3A689B for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.43
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.43 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.169, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I-fFSN0jpmIv for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from etmail.acmepacket.com (etmail.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02DB63A6827 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.7) by etmail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.375.2; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:07:50 -0400
Received: from mail.acmepacket.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail ([127.0.0.1]) with mapi; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:07:47 -0400
From: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
To: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:06:08 -0400
Subject: Re: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent
Thread-Topic: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent
Thread-Index: ActJJqaw42BkNkfxSRC4Dnenn4+l7g==
Message-ID: <1AFCDFB4-98CC-490D-89DA-A01377AE87FA@acmepacket.com>
References: <20100828160104.ABB016BE557@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <tslhbien28x.fsf@mit.edu> <FD26FDE7CD5040B3846E71047A4EB072@your029b8cecfe> <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB177049A97D926EF@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <64E1C4AD-D3FD-4FC9-AC17-57BF1519DBFE@NLnetLabs.nl> <876E888C-2128-4EEB-B46D-BA0865BE16C1@acmepacket.com> <p06240624c8a1de7a40e2@[99.111.97.129]>
In-Reply-To: <p06240624c8a1de7a40e2@[99.111.97.129]>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:07:21 -0000

On Aug 30, 2010, at 6:21 PM, Randall Gellens wrote:
> 
> Why Kauai?  You list detailed reasons why Hawaii is logical and 
> solves for many of the problems, but you don't say why this island.

Because it's the nicest, obviously. :)


> 
>>   We can even rotate islands if people get bored.
> 
> Well, there are extensive conference facilities on Oahu, the Big 
> Island, Maui, and Kauai.  I have no information as to if they would 
> work for a group of our size and with our need for breakout rooms.

I used to attend IEEE 802 and they met in Kauai (Grand Hyatt in Poipu) every few years, but they were a smaller group.  There aren't many restaurants nearby, but I certainly don't remember anyone ever complaining about it. ;)

-hadriel