Re: An oversight function - composition thereof?

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Wed, 15 September 2004 19:04 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA29457; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 15:04:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C7fAL-00027t-FK; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 15:10:06 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C7emp-0003oh-0H; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:45:47 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C7ekC-00031M-Cx for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:43:04 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA27655 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:43:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ns.jck.com ([209.187.148.211] helo=bs.jck.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C7epL-0001dc-MQ for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:48:25 -0400
Received: from [209.187.148.215] (helo=scan.jck.com) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C7ek5-0008WR-8T; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:42:57 -0400
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:42:57 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>, Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Message-ID: <AB496D12DA36BB470D296183@scan.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <4148071A.40305@zurich.ibm.com>
References: <7FC09478191E4F19F9FFD565@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126> <4148071A.40305@zurich.ibm.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b19722fc8d3865b147c75ae2495625f2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: An oversight function - composition thereof?
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 69a74e02bbee44ab4f8eafdbcedd94a1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


--On Wednesday, 15 September, 2004 11:10 +0200 Brian E Carpenter
<brc@zurich.ibm.com> wrote:

>...
>> 3) What's an appropriate selection mechanism for that group?
> 
> Firstly, I'd say that the IETF and IAB Chairs, and one other
> IESG
> and IAB member, should be included automatically. I also think
> that the ISOC President/CEO should be included automatically.

Brian,

I think this is wrong.  The reasons are summarized in my recent
long posting, although from a somewhat different perspective.
It seems obvious to have a significant voting presence in this
body by the IETF and IAB Chairs, plus additional IAB/IESG folks.
However, if the group also handles (or directs the handling of)
donations, there is the serious potential for the appearance of
a conflict of interest if the folks who are making the
standards-approval decisions are also in that loop.   The IAB
(and its Chair) are in considerably better shape on this than
the IESG (and the IETF Chair), since the IAB has not direct
standards-setting responsibility.  But the turf is pretty
dangerous and, ultimately, the IETF's collective reputation for
balance and impartiality is one of our most important assets.

>...

    john


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf