Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 20 September 2018 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDC1130E03 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JtEnWSAbAlba for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:32:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA616130DBE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [169.254.89.122] (50-1-51-141.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w8KFW5Wa037776 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:32:06 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 50-1-51-141.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.141] claimed to be [169.254.89.122]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:32:39 -0700
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12r5523)
Message-ID: <0FE3D4B6-CDDC-40A5-AC84-9C9E24278919@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180920151907.5wxxlccrvcgzjzcz@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <cafa1282-ae6a-93de-ea4a-d100af28d8b8@digitaldissidents.org> <20180920132601.uwv2lblcvr4ojtk5@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAHbuEH7jeGLBMH8Yi+_o+o-NvZKmWt4KbtwbP-8XtL0taUCx_Q@mail.gmail.com> <20180920143103.lvg6rmkzqfyjq3fr@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <52399791-9285-bcab-4fcd-3eb0f0a1f64f@gmail.com> <20180920151907.5wxxlccrvcgzjzcz@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/EMVxFjFolHvxnI693qy8tf7A3GQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:32:53 -0000

On 20 Sep 2018, at 8:19, Toerless Eckert wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 06:50:14AM -0800, Melinda Shore wrote:
>> On 9/20/18 6:31 AM, Toerless Eckert wrote:
>>> Thinking beyond my frustration with virtue signalling:
>>
>> I'm not sure that it's helpful to suggest that there's no
>> actual substance to concerns about inadvertent offense
>> being caused by unthoughtful use of language, partly
>> because it's insulting and dismissive but primarily because
>> it's simply not accurate.
>
> virtue signalling describes the condition where a proposed change
> does not address or resolve real concerns but is just introduced
> to suggest empathy and only accelerates the euphemism treadmill.

It's hard to tell if you are saying that the people on this thread who 
believe that using better language will resolve real concerns are wrong, 
or if you are accusing them of lying.

--Paul Hoffman