Re: ITU-T Dubai Meeting

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Fri, 10 August 2012 14:26 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7278021F8646 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:26:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.562
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.963, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9uBI6h9ZkXLA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:26:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8745721F8618 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:26:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so2728549obb.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:26:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=NEycDPNcDXsus/9OQLvCOwYsBmIBEhiE7172lfEkl9A=; b=XT+FFhxo7WLZleqrbvbAmN5tLTP9r+aebZJrmXq3PzWvjZfeWs3UaztjGlxZwQ3d/J gq9Ayj7PXpY/PM0UtCRKortU9KIr/XB8WTCGHawkKrvrSwRE3aAyyrtR+8BxYQPL2A1n vDtAvtlClVUqvO+Mhb3Bw6d9x4Q+ntHsteSFdYLnHTx0l3h9q2FshXZW2IiK5jPhCf1P sgRFvesWHcKE66DRJc/U1ciKU5gdKybP0UGt2Emk4ujNTJEOlmwTARPTj6QqpzrWzCE5 qN6nNc0RRbjKYdGSTeGfWmKGcDIzvy0+PVKRT0ybGQZJNqCcDSFGuK+gM5QqimhD/pCa sUUw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.207.6 with SMTP id ls6mr4411960obc.36.1344608792001; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:26:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.80.10 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m2hasayick.wl%randy@psg.com>
References: <20120802184436.87A0318C11F@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <CAMm+Lwg2HgO-=9ED4vbmO+Vf9r6bYPcLDgfyMAyPdEPVgRm4LQ@mail.gmail.com> <FB949BEA-5BDB-401A-8A75-E9A9BDAA72A6@ripe.net> <20120803182500.1F9512344DBF@drugs.dv.isc.org> <1938E5FD-57DE-4172-834A-55CA1FDAF29A@burkov.aha.ru> <CAMm+Lwhw=XUPKgAJaVeXcQ5mG++hNL9PkmAfqOPyVZo9oi=suQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2vcgs85qn.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAMm+LwjEara+=_BKu7JFsf4Fhbyxr8b6R-hL-QNX0qfXvZLztg@mail.gmail.com> <m2sjbvxwwn.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAMm+Lwi6EBavRdUqsS1YRwr01m31LfZW=LPtMERRwb8NmqbuyQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2hasayick.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 10:26:31 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwhViaKxRkVapXHiovEQaTkn4e2GVf4eWViBcm9nj-PsuA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ITU-T Dubai Meeting
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: IETF Disgust <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 14:26:33 -0000

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> hundreds or thousands is perceptually much larger than 100.
>
>> Predicting that institutions will become corrupt over long periods of
>> time is hardly hyperbolic.
>
> the institutions are corrupt now.

Pointing that out right now hardly helps the cause of stopping the
ITU-T getting control of their function.


> as to dnssec, opinions seem to vary widely, and yours is a few sigma
> out.  some think you/verisign stalled it for five years becuase you
> could not commercialize it.  but i really do not care.

I stated the conditions under which deployment would take place in
.net and .com. Had you genuinely believed that I did not intend to
deploy in any case and was merely stalling you should have given me
what I had asked for and put me on the spot.

The reason you pulled the procedural manipulations with the bogus DNS
Directorate review etc. was that you were convinced that VeriSign had
no choice but to deploy.

If it had been my product I would have brought the lawyers in at that
point. A working group chair is not entitled to re-litigate arguments
that they have already lost by referring them to a directorate and
directorates are not permitted to re-litigate working group
discussions.


The fact that you made such a personal intervention on an issue that
you really don't care about speaks volumes.

I find it amazing how often the members of the elder generation pull
the following sililoquy:

1) I do not understand the issues here, therefore nobody can understand them
2) We must be careful not to make mistakes by making decisions we do
not understand
3) Therefore everyone must do it my way as it makes no difference


Difference between you and me is that when I know I don't know
something I either go talk to people who do and find out or I don't
get involved with that issue. You pronounce that nobody understands it
and then demand to be the decision maker.




Website: http://hallambaker.com/