IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring

Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu> Tue, 07 September 2004 21:44 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA09858; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 17:44:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C4npA-0000UI-0E; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 17:48:25 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C4nVm-000733-Lj; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 17:28:22 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C4l2O-0006Me-7c for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 14:49:52 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA19767 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 14:49:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.mit.edu ([18.18.3.197] helo=cz.mit.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C4l5p-00038r-0G for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 14:53:28 -0400
Received: by cz.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 597ADE004D; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 14:50:41 -0400 (EDT)
To: Aaron Falk <falk@ISI.EDU>
References: <412D268D.3020402@thinkingcat.com> <tslhdqcuj8i.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <BC833A4B-00FC-11D9-9699-000A95DBDB84@isi.edu>
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 14:50:41 -0400
In-Reply-To: <BC833A4B-00FC-11D9-9699-000A95DBDB84@isi.edu> (Aaron Falk's message of "Tue, 7 Sep 2004 11:35:47 -0700")
Message-ID: <tsl656pvrpa.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 17:28:21 -0400
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8

>>>>> "Aaron" == Aaron Falk <falk@ISI.EDU> writes:

    Aaron> On Sep 5, 2004, at 4:15 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:

    >> I do not think that recommendation 7 in scenario B is a good
    >> idea.  I believe that plenary time is full enough without
    >> crowding it more.

    Aaron> What about a 'business meeting' that is scheduled in wg
    Aaron> slot or even on Sunday?

If needed, this would be fine.  I'm not convinced that open f2f time
will be needed.  However I think there is a simple test for whether
the time is needed: can we come up with an agenda that fills a slot
and meaningfully involves the community?

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status