IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 28 November 2012 16:32 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987CD21F84B5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:32:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uNO+QgvM92u1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:32:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ams-iport-3.cisco.com (ams-iport-3.cisco.com [144.254.224.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C3B21F849A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:32:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=348; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1354120358; x=1355329958; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z/NoHHoTNl7kjVgYAWVyY7TYFc0dePv9rjDX2eiY4N4=; b=X+W8P3XA0mc4KqCCpIMywthP25hXpeTuquIeUQr06ZTQsnizDJU9F2T1 l4BV5LA51GrhZCVZuH7sJxfCAv1oVAC505479opXtzCce6RKICrPDgx5d DRfgB+vrpasvAPmMLc7zPYeUMgklEoeH0J6XcdK71Vcd6W/5bt2C7wAmA Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnUKAHo7tlCQ/khN/2dsb2JhbABFhiq2J4JABAN+FnOCHgEBAQQjSwoBEAsYAgIFFgsCAgkDAgECAUUGDQEHAQGIC6wfknmBIo5LgRMDlgGQRIJx
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6909"; a="9982844"
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by ams-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Nov 2012 16:32:36 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-55-85-194.cisco.com (dhcp-10-55-85-194.cisco.com [10.55.85.194]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qASGWZ7G005909 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:32:36 GMT
Message-ID: <50B63CA3.4040907@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:32:35 +0100
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists"
References: <CAC4RtVCogYS4tmY1LLi0C-E+B+di2_wTD0N-=AZrVR7-A8Mz+A@mail.gmail.com> <20121127231404.GC1941@verdi> <m2mwy26iud.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2mwy26iud.wl%randy@psg.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, John Leslie <john@jlc.net>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:32:38 -0000

On 11/28/12 12:57 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> I'm increasingly seeing a "paradigm" where the review happens _before_
>> adoption as a WG draft.
> and one consequence is that the design gets done outside of the ietf
> process.
>

But this isn't necessarily a bad thing.  It's nice to have reasonably
well thought out ideas come in.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email