Re: Call for input: draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-00.txt

"Anthony G. Atkielski" <anthony@atkielski.com> Wed, 01 February 2006 04:31 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F49eG-00007E-3l; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:31:16 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F49eE-00006q-HC for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:31:14 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA05679 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:29:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from laubervilliers-151-12-129-223.w193-252.abo.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.54.223] helo=freebie.atkielski.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F49pH-0004gj-Gl for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:42:41 -0500
Received: from pix.atkielski.com (pix.atkielski.com [10.0.0.40]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k114Ut6s036910 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 05:30:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@atkielski.com)
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 05:30:55 +0100
From: "Anthony G. Atkielski" <anthony@atkielski.com>
Organization: Anthony Atkielski
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <1487089042.20060201053055@atkielski.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20060201024208.570DBE0074@carter-zimmerman.mit.edu>
References: <20060201024208.570DBE0074@carter-zimmerman.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 3.5 (+++)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Call for input: draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Sam Hartman writes:

> I'm interested in feedback on the following issues:
>
> * Is 18 months too long for the experiment.  I don't think so but have
> received one comment requesting 12 months.
>
> * Are there limits that need to be placed on the IESG's authority?  My
>   preference is to grant the same authority available under RFC
> 2418 for WG lists to all IETF lists.
>
> * Are there other changes that need to be made?

You forgot this:

* Are there better ways for list members to spend their time in
service of the IETF than by coming up with new ways to censor and ban
on mailing lists?

Perhaps some simplification is in order; I believe an Act of Congress
might be a good model to follow in looking for something less complex
than the current policy.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf