Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Tue, 24 January 2017 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7691294CF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:25:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nKgJMlB9ObmT for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:25:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (ns.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E23811294C5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:25:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [198.252.137.70] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1cW4qB-000ElL-VR; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 12:25:07 -0500
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 12:25:02 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-05.txt> (Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 certificates) to Proposed Standard
Message-ID: <B9F32633ED13374379C6E0D1@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1701241129250.84185@ary.qy>
References: <20170124020138.65213.qmail@ary.lan> <2A6C1E77A2FDB3E4147305EA@PSB> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1701241129250.84185@ary.qy>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.70
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/EzYkm-3Qh6SAq-VZFx_eo4KYRgI>
Cc: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:25:10 -0000


--On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 11:40 -0500 John R Levine
<johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

>> Have you read the spec, or are you just responding to my notes
>> and/or Patrik's?
> 
> I reread the spec, which was a good idea.  It says the domain
> names can contain U-labels and NR-LDH ASCII labels, which
> seems correct.  That forbids both A-labels and dodgy stuff
> that looks like A-labels but isn't.

Thanks.  That is consistent with my impression.   My concern is
that the language and terminology won't make it clear about what
is being specified unless someone is _really_ familiar with IDNA
and the "EAI" specs.   It meshes with Patrik's concern that the
wording of the spec won't be clear to someone who is not _very_
good with English.

My impression is that there is little problem with the intended
underlying spec, but the document text needs some tuning.

     john