IETF Logo Mail Archive

Scenario C (was: Scenario O)

kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen) Thu, 23 September 2004 22:35 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA00883; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:35:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAcIJ-0003yY-TZ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:42:33 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CAc1x-00083D-R2; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:25:37 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CAbmm-0001Ix-4K for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:09:56 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA28288 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:09:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from colo.khms.westfalen.de ([213.239.196.208]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAbtc-0003TJ-W0 for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:17:02 -0400
Received: from khms.vpn ([10.172.192.2]:33538 helo=khms.westfalen.de ident=Debian-exim) by colo.khms.westfalen.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CAbYB-0007kw-JH for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 23:54:52 +0200
Received: from root (helo=khms.westfalen.de) by khms.westfalen.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CANc7-00017T-Pu for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:01:59 +0200
Received: by khms.westfalen.de (CrossPoint v3.12d.kh14 R/C435); 23 Sep 2004 08:59:44 +0200
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:45:00 +0200
From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de
To: ietf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <9HReafrXw-B@khms.westfalen.de>
References: <97863432A038833EBB502DF5@scan.jck.com>
X-Mailer: CrossPoint v3.12d.kh14 R/C435
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding?
References: <97863432A038833EBB502DF5@scan.jck.com>
X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail.
Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail.
X-Fix-Your-Modem: +++ATS2=255&WO1
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 30ac594df0e66ffa5a93eb4c48bcb014
Subject: Scenario C (was: Scenario O)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2

john-ietf@jck.com (John C Klensin)  wrote on 21.09.04 in <97863432A038833EBB502DF5@scan.jck.com>:

> (time to change the subject line enough to do some
> differentiation)

... but presumably this was the wrong change?


MfG Kai

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status