Re: New Version Notification for draft-leiba-rfc2119-update-00.txt

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 11 August 2016 13:48 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B19D12D689 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 06:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w_owDyZmhuUq for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 06:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x233.google.com (mail-qk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5500912D586 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 06:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id t7so4461673qkh.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 06:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=l2eVqzz69u5tNM0i12oOC4ZQjKvj04c9kQMpJWv+m08=; b=TXovM3NH6ZnXQGiXQo3f0DQYddopbEoYgAdLgL4Z/ZfTzgNQ6zcalCwkWbeQg99JgA w0SVHJxM95IifE+eqKzXKUQuKRLCXCPIWBeID0MewRMsL/0XmzIIMylu5yyqAo4QK1SE A2+dvgoPza4lSY9Mu5ARZWJv9IEg205wy0O27OAtIbzaNlMssOnwfmdPIQ+mxBAejC8h c6zqeF05Vxkgi9nHGyV+Cm7tV3BNaYHRnPLWvIWQqECvdiWas/4IljJuf6OUMbTxt9nP ElcC0ZqB//WcOhs9SCWhewneBN2aLS7dPI9rX808+SCwq2kLleWmwagmsRF1N+l40DG9 mB/Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=l2eVqzz69u5tNM0i12oOC4ZQjKvj04c9kQMpJWv+m08=; b=RRrMX3nfUTCxJ0CYNXvV/22UrbfOcsH/MICEmMN4hdYXi/usR3PlQEXGpKRk5mgucq yZyK+HanqIwN/usK0xWLO+b3wcsKfob79Zz4lBrrpyG1+FKY/B8xbnpmGUUyTGoL9/to WLNsx6/xPiDKS+tepyf1QWKOLZ4T+HvLxu8zPVHEj2LQ33hi1fbMN1PlQ72J+T+PPcBV d4SApgt7XeoJGpThiYlNNquWGYcvWax/ldkxfJlROPhJt1kLwz7MHrDdjJCCSo/8k3E3 0Y5E6JihogysT+f2TCfPw2RMgCxznCvNs/8Fglzln9y3zXxiy5i4b14WeWhHM0aczn/6 0pbQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvZNVUdyfBKqyuRNrXX7v6wiERGdjJGXzuLuqVcg9ofbl0jkjw2Ia/fN60SJNClLA2qHmxDPEoKtWPP0g==
X-Received: by 10.55.41.71 with SMTP id p68mr11399970qkh.218.1470923320434; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 06:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.39.52 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 06:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <f30c2fb9-2f84-4ff1-8bd2-f70fe4201838@gmail.com>
References: <147077254472.30640.13738163813175851232.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJLHx7ytgZqZ9zQXA3vVSU-pNggQQs+QiDnzQ4tBEH5VAQ@mail.gmail.com> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D9240CC47@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net> <f30c2fb9-2f84-4ff1-8bd2-f70fe4201838@gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 08:48:38 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: MNNa0_rr-5RHRqjWLHoBISlHIys
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+BqsdDv24AeZCDbkVwuG1ooTx+Dc5TY0aki9E6B2gk4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-leiba-rfc2119-update-00.txt
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/F2M5l40m1wCrF03UpU_7yUpq3kc>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:48:45 -0000

> Optional is useful in a requirements RFC.
>
> Feature x is REQUIRED
>
> Feature y is OPTIONAL

I think it's clear from the discussion that we do not have consensus
on deprecating the adjectives and are not likely to, so I will remove
those in the next update.  That makes me inclined to remove the whole
section and, as John suggests, keep this purely to the issue of
capitals... unless there's a real interest in deprecating "SHALL" and
"SHALL NOT", as they add nothing to the "MUST"s other than
history/custom.

Barry