Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 25 April 2014 02:24 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93C81A02D4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 19:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.172
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.172 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ssN5FIXgWjcE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 19:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com (shell-too.nominum.com [64.89.228.229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797A51A028F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 19:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE7A1B8087 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 19:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339EB19005C; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 19:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.10.40] (192.168.1.10) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 19:24:44 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
Subject: Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <57E35BDB-30DF-4829-A6CE-F1132E0C2EFC@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 22:23:58 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <DC6E3687-2567-42D3-B6E3-B594132A3BCD@nominum.com>
References: <20140425002622.E6DFA1ACE0@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp> <7859156.ek3Qf5sxiO@scott-latitude-e6320> <57E35BDB-30DF-4829-A6CE-F1132E0C2EFC@gmail.com>
To: Douglas Otis <doug.mtview@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/F82uKIaJA44zqtW6pVMdU-5ecXk
Cc: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 02:24:53 -0000

On Apr 24, 2014, at 9:41 PM, Douglas Otis <doug.mtview@gmail.com> wrote:
> The US government failed to protect citizen's rights by not declaring ISPs common carriers.

Is this conversation really appropriate for the IETF mailing list?