RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06

"Peter Yee" <peter@akayla.com> Mon, 08 February 2016 18:35 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@akayla.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952171B3124; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 10:35:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iD3hsXBW2Zq3; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 10:35:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p3plsmtpa07-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa07-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.192.235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA0861B30DF; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 10:35:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spectre ([173.8.184.78]) by p3plsmtpa07-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with id FubD1s00D1huGat01ubEmX; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 11:35:14 -0700
From: "Peter Yee" <peter@akayla.com>
To: "'Luigi Iannone'" <ggx@gigix.net>
References: <004001d1608f$ef60e6b0$ce22b410$@akayla.com> <30DBBD82-6F32-4D05-B1D6-0E2564855ED7@gigix.net> <B3384C62-EE51-4E80-9A75-B49AD16172C9@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <B3384C62-EE51-4E80-9A75-B49AD16172C9@gigix.net>
Subject: RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 10:35:25 -0800
Message-ID: <00a701d1629f$7a9719a0$6fc54ce0$@akayla.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGxJZY9Li5JV/wdtpeDuTggRpcmrAIQzdH7Ag2cWSKfQgBPkA==
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/FNPocEFH_iBD_WfdJF6GFSqNYZI>
Cc: draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt.all@tools.ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:35:16 -0000

No problem, Luigi.  I'll just be happy if my feedback proves helpful.

		-Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Luigi Iannone [mailto:ggx@gigix.net] 
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 3:19 AM
To: Luigi Iannone
Cc: Peter Yee; draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt.all@tools.ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06


> On 08 Feb 2016, at 12:17, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> Back in April we indeed did not sent you a specific feedback. 
> Reason is that we received several comments/reviews and batched everything in a new I-D, with sending specific feedback to all.
> 

The correct sentence is: “without sending specific feedback to all”

I should really start to proofread my mails before hitting the send button  ;-)

ciao

L.

> Yet, if you are unsatisfied on how we addressed the issues we certainly need to do more work.
> 
> Give me some time to go again thoroughly through your first review and I’ll get back to you with a specific feedback.
> 
> Thanks for your time spent on this document.
> 
> ciao
> 
> L.
> 
> 
> 
>> On 06 Feb 2016, at 04:39, Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft.  The General Area 
>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by 
>> the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like 
>> any other last call comment.  For background on Gen-ART, please see 
>> the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
>> 
>> Document: draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06
>> Reviewer: Peter Yee
>> Review Date: February 5, 2016
>> IETF LC End Date: February 5, 2016
>> IESG Telechat date: February 18, 2016
>> 
>> Summary: This draft has serious issues, described in the review, and 
>> needs to be rethought. [Not ready]
>> 
>> The draft attempts to specify the framework for the management of 
>> experimental LISP EID sub-prefixes, but really could use some 
>> additional work to flesh out the management aspects that are left unsaid.
>> 
>> This draft fixes only two minor nits I raised in my review of the -04 
>> version.  Nothing else has been addressed, nor have I received any 
>> feedback on that review.  In light of this, I have little new to add.  
>> It is possible that the agreement between the IANA and the RIPE NCC 
>> will alleviate the major concern I had with the draft, but not being 
>> privy to that agreement, I can't make that determination.
>> 
>> My original review with the unaddressed comments can be found here:
>> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg11620.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>