Re: HTML for email

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Mon, 01 March 2021 23:30 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D423A24EA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 15:30:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sNT1MlSpWi-n for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 15:30:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from buffalo.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (buffalo.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BFCA3A24E9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 15:30:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D9501E2392; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 23:30:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a86.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-15-19.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.15.19]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9DC001E20E8; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 23:30:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a86.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 100.96.15.19 (trex/6.0.2); Mon, 01 Mar 2021 23:30:08 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Robust-Illustrious: 09732c64001b937d_1614641407931_617044198
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1614641407931:1341284716
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1614641407931
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a86.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a86.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB7A7F10F; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 15:30:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=vrJ6ss2NIasiDg rxqF/Tf+lxJ1o=; b=ZChrxAK7ZwLzkfFD2kmr7BP/pMW2/XFty0jeDgjQjqWBFf Hzeae1C1kKnAp7JV0eQqU5S2eVd1XP6LfK8wZ0vXsMC3uSl2+1mlmpNvxVaFyt3+ iwa7j7MxT0a45p2bLvoSqjlNudvGnpOB9A+SxpNzyujNcOwEkwu8ykr40nwSY=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a86.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 447D47E52C; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 15:30:03 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 17:30:00 -0600
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a86
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
Cc: 'tom petch' <daedulus@btconnect.com>, 'Phillip Hallam-Baker' <phill@hallambaker.com>, 'Keith Moore' <moore@network-heretics.com>, 'IETF Discussion Mailing List' <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: HTML for email
Message-ID: <20210301233000.GK30153@localhost>
References: <20210227190200.06ED46F10439@ary.qy> <4064.1614454347@localhost> <s1f0vo$ejp$1@gal.iecc.com> <59240886-320d-fae3-6b98-7b83dacaf5e7@network-heretics.com> <CAMm+LwhWCsG68GOws-Zm9TDcEZ4trGBhq7Dm-_0Ci8Ri7kDK=Q@mail.gmail.com> <603D2360.1070406@btconnect.com> <01f901d70ec0$aa28cfb0$fe7a6f10$@acm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <01f901d70ec0$aa28cfb0$fe7a6f10$@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/FRcdStfZY11OxCAQE_XPnovpnmk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 23:30:12 -0000

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 09:31:06AM -0800, Larry Masinter wrote:
> There's been no interest in the email community for defining a "for
> email" profile of HTML and multipart/related (or WPACK).  Why is that?

Maybe because we don't like any of it and none of us is being paid to do it.