Re: Last Call: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> (SMTP 521 and 556 Reply Codes) to Proposed Standard
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 06 March 2015 01:47 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACFAB1A90A6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 17:47:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.862
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.862 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KSVG64Ph4Qlh for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 17:47:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C78CF1A9091 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 17:47:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 89030 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2015 01:47:03 -0000
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 6 Mar 2015 01:47:03 -0000
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 01:46:41 -0000
Message-ID: <20150306014641.10309.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> (SMTP 521 and 556 Reply Codes) to Proposed Standard
In-Reply-To: <20150305200224.29517.60563.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/FSep5ejyU5MII3MybxwqVxCCMWk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 01:47:06 -0000
In article <20150305200224.29517.60563.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> you write: > >The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider >the following document: >- 'SMTP 521 and 556 Reply Codes' > <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> as Proposed Standard I have reviewed this draft and think it's just fine. It provides return codes useful with the upcoming null MX RFC, and since null MX is in active use (Google told me today that gmail checks for it), the return codes are likely to be useful, too. R's, John
- Re: Last Call: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt… John Levine
- Re: Last Call: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt… John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt… John Levine
- Re: Last Call: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt… Barry Leiba