Re: Consultation on *revised* IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Thu, 04 June 2020 06:09 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B153A08E3; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 23:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E4HUZIC6480a; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 23:09:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1203A08E7; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 23:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.116.117.195]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 05468reT026725 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Jun 2020 23:09:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1591250946; x=1591337346; i=@elandsys.com; bh=H7rX1sJcnV3j8uuisw6yAmdrd9dME55Uw36CaYjRqsU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=PztWHFcrlbhggN2Eqg1FB/hvi3sTYhrdecVJQETUNohBj4Xes2LvbBGEkClCjT1bv 4ECEO+V24h1HZIaXd1GbCl6R8b3H5aqj7sWZX9Xz30TBpJ9QkR0jejlu86LvJYbcd3 7F//WhvRFlRgl3D8VQ+ywFjrzIto15VDaRYW0yGM=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200603220502.0db2ec30@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 23:06:07 -0700
To: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: Consultation on *revised* IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
In-Reply-To: <D1E59F95-BB36-4D86-A937-327AE04E8F5F@ietf.org>
References: <159115348321.13976.12703268950916172390@ietfa.amsl.com> <5435ade6-fdaa-4793-e5cd-438f6a0298d4@cs.tcd.ie> <1FE0EF67-6AC8-424B-8E30-5B85C931B230@ietf.org> <d3626a2f-271a-b85b-35da-32cb9213212a@cs.tcd.ie> <D1E59F95-BB36-4D86-A937-327AE04E8F5F@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/FY9tr5PDc0l0VH_R-xqTYBSolJ8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 06:09:18 -0000

Hi Jay,
At 09:41 PM 03-06-2020, Jay Daley wrote:
>My response to 2 is that we just disagree and I don't detect any 
>support for your position or other indication of a path to resolve 
>this and so I think we need to leave it here.

In my opinion, Stephen is right.  I didn't comment on his email 
because my perception is that I would have to provide evidence to 
support my claim.  I don't think that is a bad thing.  It is not 
worth investing time when I am not even a major internal customer.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy