IETF Logo Mail Archive

question to the IAOC: new committee members

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Wed, 16 November 2016 10:38 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=11287f685d=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E04A61288B8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 02:38:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=jordi.palet@consulintel.es header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6YJ6Dalg72Fm for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 02:38:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [217.126.185.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6843C129501 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 02:38:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1479292694; x=1479897494; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; bh=EZrDtFiyksFhAheXggb0qq5am8OjYCgkNANvY22eOhM=; b=su5wj5YivnFeD Uzi/gwOjLM1NtGUbEDhs6v6njxq7gqKrZfRj5zKf+HvTuaHwZiUVR6sqCIOHMAqa WwR7+cYmGrOoKOO39cWiljLLPcfv2cwbPB5X6JaiCBuvW/AJ0JDXRdARHLNmqSXf nZeuOweKwd9dqWEQPBag47IOCit4t0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=ctj+j41CZmG/XWshPLtNU+9bZBmjPcP6w+F+0MaC2rh06PdQ0ZieHAse6QKn rBR0tQiOMEGwecyRtXSTFN1QwUXRhwag1WWF0ds3ZLN+aA4bSTiG8LG6Q 981ZxXMd1RISm+HrObitxb2wIKTL+rcSNxy4L3Y8NknyxLgnqqcE58=;
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:38:14 +0100
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:38:14 +0100
Received: from [31.133.140.36] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50005226031.msg for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:38:13 +0100
X-MDOP-RefID: re=0.000,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-HashCash: 1:20:161116:md50005226031::izyqTl0Du/3+lDLg:000055o1
X-MDRemoteIP: 31.133.140.36
X-Return-Path: prvs=11287f685d=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ietf@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1b.0.161010
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 19:38:06 +0900
Subject: question to the IAOC: new committee members
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: ietf@ietf.org, iaoc@ietf.org
Message-ID: <936695FE-FC31-4C91-9D49-38C39F44207A@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: question to the IAOC: new committee members
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/FYLuNcP_sjALnxJUYeHYORvNZuo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:38:19 -0000

All the IETF positions have rules to be selected, nomcom, etc., and there is a great transparency on the process.

However today we discovered that new members have been selected for IAOC committees.

What have been the rules/process for that?

One of the questions that have been discussed several times is the lack of transparency from the IAOC, and clearly here we have a new demonstration of that.

I hope there is a clear statement from IAOC explaining the process.

If that not happens, what is the process to appeal that decision, so I can follow it?

We as a community, in my opinion, can’t keep going with this lack of transparency.

Regards,
Jordi




**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email