Re: [Recentattendees] Remote Participation for IETF 95: Meetecho Details

Lucy Lynch <llynch@civil-tongue.net> Thu, 31 March 2016 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <llynch@civil-tongue.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E160112D72D; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SyMClNQBzZSj; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hans.rg.net (hans.rg.net [IPv6:2001:418:1::42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6EF12D728; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hans.rg.net (hans.rg.net [IPv6:2001:418:1:0:0:0:0:42]) (authenticated bits=0) by hans.rg.net (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id u2VIS3hp016244 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:28:03 GMT (envelope-from llynch@civil-tongue.net)
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:28:03 +0000 (UTC)
From: Lucy Lynch <llynch@civil-tongue.net>
X-X-Sender: llynch@hans.rg.net
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] Remote Participation for IETF 95: Meetecho Details
In-Reply-To: <56FD6B10.6050907@dcrocker.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1603311825160.41080@hans.rg.net>
References: <20160330202243.4795.63685.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <3B8E9BB3EC165D1102AA9714@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <56FD6B10.6050907@dcrocker.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/FgjjuzSOgwguRrYhpzIQoZADsKc>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, wgchairs@ietf.org, IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat@ietf.org>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:28:10 -0000

On Thu, 31 Mar 2016, Dave Crocker wrote:

> On 3/31/2016 11:15 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
>> I notice that the placeholder for IETF 95 "Remote Participation"
>> athttp://www.ietf.org/  still is not associated with a link.  On
>> the meeting page (http://www.ietf.org/meeting/95/index.html),
> ...
>
>
> Yes, there are some hiccups in some of the pages.
>
> However I latched onto the directive that remote participants need to 
> register and, after searching and finding the problems you cited, decided to 
> try to register.  There I found that I could choose 'remote participation' as 
> a class of registration and everything else was normal, except that it didn't 
> charge me.

... but the "everything else was normal" actually includes a number of 
options that are not relevant to remote participation and the form is long 
and confusing. How hard would it be to make a separate form for remote 
users with fewer steps and fewer options? Linking directly from the 
meetecho pages to a short form would be peachy.

- Lucy

> d/
>
>