Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF

S Moonesamy <> Thu, 25 February 2021 06:15 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863D43A13CE for <>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 22:15:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.688
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.688 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)"
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZTQ1hozZwB6r for <>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 22:15:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E66C3A13CC for <>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 22:15:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 11P6F7tD012099 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 22:15:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail; t=1614233719; x=1614320119;; bh=yzMBSal1sv/l+Rndk4kx7yyBcdtPlG/4e36A3S7KHFU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=sxVfpmWsarTGeIMopv3oZtv+aRSIfMcKSbTiscSo8386GtsZGMlkocs3Q4qrq/xXE 54LkBTlJvDxnNGPDHd49lrryk8oCNacPKhfDCsprr3JmT5pQYLnQArhnRPDP4mhQWl H7csrTKVLsTZ2ynxcvNxC2QCJJ9nsNYg3IELzVOM=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 22:13:19 -0800
To: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <>,
From: S Moonesamy <>
Subject: Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF
In-Reply-To: <CADNypP8GKTY-Jhpb6AEfcpXOihwLap7OrrByNemGc2GNvZLeog@mail.g>
References: <> <> <> <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 06:15:36 -0000

Hi Rifaat,
At 04:40 AM 23-02-2021, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote:
>So you have never reached out to us to try to bring any work to the 
>WG, and based on attending one meeting and hearing from a few 
>people, you formed a strong opinion and declared that "nothing would 
>get done"? that seems odd.

I suggest looking at it from a different perspective.  A person who 
is new to the IETF attends a working group session held at some 
exotic location.  There are the usual active participants debating 
during the session.  There isn't any significant progress on the 
issue(s) in his/her opinion.  Would he/she commit more time to engage 
in that working group?

S. Moonesamy