Re: "An open letter" signed by some IAB members

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Tue, 19 November 2019 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D73120839 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 05:46:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=ReuFwpsq; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=VgnWJx03
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2sBQKplRFrEl for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 05:46:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.yitter.info (mx4.yitter.info [159.203.56.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F90C1200F8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 05:46:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7639ABCE07 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 13:46:09 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1574171169; bh=sKoAvn2VIVcmG+uCWjJt2nyLySQnnLQXDcxs4C/xgWc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ReuFwpsqg2FcnXWwI7Cy6m67/q0nEYe0WVS9afkk+QUCUeIS32D1lIeeCxJ93EzW9 13dccveErVk8w0S5syr55eeJaexGJPvmPGVPAcmiVpbE/C8VISLaJFIxkpxuQDf22O YQLBTaLwlS1GcCVUas6c9e0e3yY0kuGTnqhRLc5o=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx4.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx4.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tuGAnAWd9rlV for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 13:46:08 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 08:46:02 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1574171168; bh=sKoAvn2VIVcmG+uCWjJt2nyLySQnnLQXDcxs4C/xgWc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=VgnWJx03Wbc5HNLpUPm4NvQN1KcCf7jXd4zZldfAZpTTxHAJNZqUoPnoqwVEAxPE/ VHx8jOSkWMSEoyKssleyBSJoFViRritYNRA5TcZCM+aYrHp9Rl9UodCL8qXjCbwrks IX96NLQlMfGVgLMr6qbZwhvgaoJJ96iXi/H0L+9I=
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: "An open letter" signed by some IAB members
Message-ID: <20191119134601.45y2uphwbyrn2lqb@mx4.yitter.info>
References: <CALaySJJN23vFf-k2VqU0Mx+sOWV8wJiTBBkDGopjK7vOtYyDyA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJJN23vFf-k2VqU0Mx+sOWV8wJiTBBkDGopjK7vOtYyDyA@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/FrlMWT1A-pzOuqYBCPyCPkZRBRI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 13:46:12 -0000

Dear colleagues,

I am an employee (CEO) of the Internet Society and I am emphatically
not speaking for it.  As a matter of full disclosure, however, the
Internet Society also issued a statement in respect of the situation
in Hong Kong, in consultation with the ISOC chapter in Hong Kong.

I was both a member and chair of the IAB for a period of time.  During
that time, the much-ballyhooed "IANA transition" happened.  I had
plenty of occasions to speak about various things going on during that
time, and I quite often used my affiliation with the IAB under such
circumstances.  It is with that background in mind that I send this
note.

On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 02:42:04PM +0800, Barry Leiba wrote:

> 1. By being signed by four IAB members who are identified primarily as
> IAB members, the letter *appears* to be from the IAB.  I have passed
> this by three non-IETF friends, asking them who they think the letter
> is from, and all three said, “The Internet Architecture Board.”

I am entirely unwilling to speculate about worldwide interpretation
trends of texts based on the sample, "Three friends of Barry Leiba
under uncontrolled questioning."  Please don't stand on that kind of
sample as anything other than the worst kind of anecdata.

> 2. By using “Member, Internet Architecture Board” this way, those
> signing the letter are effectively (whether by intent or not) using
> their IAB positions to gain credibility for their personal opinions.

Or else they are presenting evidence that a community that the audiece
might otherwise respect decided that these were people who had a thing
or two to say about how the Internet works.  That seems to me
important because …
 
> I think this is wildly inappropriate.

… I think it is wildly appropriate.  The _very point_ of the IAB is
that it is not subject to consensus rules that the IETF is.  I think
it would indeed be inappropriate for people to use their affiliation
with the IESG this way: the IESG _does_ speak for the IETF.  But the
IAB does not, and that not-speaking-for role is in fact part of the
_point_ of having the IAB at all.

If IAB members cannot tell people, "I have this view and, by the way,
my community appointed me to this August Body precisely so that I
would have views and say them," then I am mystified what we want the
IAB for except simple constitutional duties.  If the IAB exists to be
the Governor General[1] of the IETF, then we should change its
charter.  But I don't think that's the IAB job today, and I think its
members need to be able to be clear under what title they have an
opinion.

Best regards,

A

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governor_General_of_Canada


-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com