IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-eggert-tcpm-historicize-00.txt> (Moving the Undeployed TCP Extensions RFC1072, RFC1106, RFC1110, RFC1145, RFC1146, RFC1263, RFC1379, RFC1644 and RFC1693 to Historic Status) to Informational RFC

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Thu, 03 February 2011 17:37 UTC

Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749AB3A6A45 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:37:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.686
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.686 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.087, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rjt43c2qW01F for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:37:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mgw-da01.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.128.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B86A3A6A3F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:37:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (esdhcp030222.research.nokia.com [172.21.30.222]) by mgw-da01.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p13Hehiq020393 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Feb 2011 19:40:44 +0200
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-eggert-tcpm-historicize-00.txt> (Moving the Undeployed TCP Extensions RFC1072, RFC1106, RFC1110, RFC1145, RFC1146, RFC1263, RFC1379, RFC1644 and RFC1693 to Historic Status) to Informational RFC
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.5 at fit.nokia.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-53-620061018"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D4AC3C3.5020003@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 19:40:40 +0200
Message-Id: <DE07D0D2-53F6-4C55-9EB4-0CC7348B8DE2@nokia.com>
References: <20110202215157.24554.29312.idtracker@localhost> <4D4AC3C3.5020003@gmail.com>
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (mail.fit.nokia.com); Thu, 03 Feb 2011 19:40:41 +0200 (EET)
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:37:26 -0000

Hi,

On 2011-2-3, at 17:03, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
> While I fully agree with what this document proposes.  This might be an editorial comment but I 've noticed that RFC 1072 is not mentioned to be made Historic despite the option specified by it is made obsolete.

you mean it's missing from Section 2? Good catch. I'll add that in my working copy.

>  What is more, referencing all the documents made obsolete normatively is OK?  Here I suggest only RFC 4614 to be mentioned in this way.

I guess they could become informative references, but you could also argue that they are required background reading and hence should be normative.

Lars

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email