IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: IPv10.

"Latif LADID [IPv6-based Internet]" <latif@ladid.lu> Sat, 12 November 2016 07:17 UTC

Return-Path: <latif@ladid.lu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6871299C3; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 23:17:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rw8UM-Igjq2o; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 23:17:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpout1.pt.lu (smtpout2.pt.lu [194.154.212.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A011012962C; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 23:17:46 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2BTAQBlwSZY/8kUqMBdGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgzMBAQEBAXeBAI0+lwqCNmOEUoxwggcdC4V7AoJLFAECAQEBAQEBAYEKhGEBAQEEAQEBBQIwNAsMAQMCCQ0EBAEBAScHGQYIHwkIAgQBEgsFC4gpAyWxTyoCiygBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBYVDhVOCSIdhBYhQBZExNQEZjH8Cg0KJbyWGCokXhCeECR6BORyFGXEBh1QBAQE
X-IPAS-Result: A2BTAQBlwSZY/8kUqMBdGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgzMBAQEBAXeBAI0+lwqCNmOEUoxwggcdC4V7AoJLFAECAQEBAQEBAYEKhGEBAQEEAQEBBQIwNAsMAQMCCQ0EBAEBAScHGQYIHwkIAgQBEgsFC4gpAyWxTyoCiygBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBYVDhVOCSIdhBYhQBZExNQEZjH8Cg0KJbyWGCokXhCeECR6BORyFGXEBh1QBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,625,1473112800"; d="scan'208";a="43902952"
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp-1.pt.lu) ([192.168.20.201]) by smtpout1.pt.lu with ESMTP; 12 Nov 2016 08:17:44 +0100
Received: from DESKTOP49DDKJB (unknown [88.207.222.120]) (Authenticated sender: pta254p1) by smtp-1.pt.lu (Post) with ESMTPA id 535D2174EBA; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:17:43 +0100 (CET)
From: "Latif LADID [IPv6-based Internet]" <latif@ladid.lu>
To: 'Brian E Carpenter' <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, 'Randy Bush' <randy@psg.com>
References: <HE1PR04MB1449514D421EAC698335EE99BDBB0@HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <37c3bc17-daa1-cac0-3848-5eb97350b87c@kit.edu> <m260ntlcra.wl-randy@psg.com> <656b8d28-6632-ddb3-34d4-5468a778cae2@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <656b8d28-6632-ddb3-34d4-5468a778cae2@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: IPv10.
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:17:43 +0100
Message-ID: <0a9b01d23cb4$dd1d4af0$9757e0d0$@ladid.lu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQHI+iw0ld5v8pfvBaVUG0Wk/wgxiQJAgiHAAs7m2McCEZlSg6Cua9ng
Content-Language: en-gb
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Fv8opbTmp1wzFF4cyj064dLoHs0>
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 07:17:50 -0000

Jon Postel will swizel in his grave if v10 is not assigned by IANA first.
Let's not confuse the market. A working group at ETSI has been formed 6
months ago called NGP ( Next Gereation Protocols) lashing at v4 and v6 to
invent a new one.  Also the ITU will jump on this one to occupy the v10
space :-)

Latif

-----Original Message-----
From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
Sent: 12 November 2016 02:43
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>; ipv6@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IPv10.

On 12/11/2016 14:15, Randy Bush wrote:
>> Right now it seems that you have got a solution proposal for a 
>> problem, that is IMHO not very clearly described.
> 
> how about ipv4 and ipv6 are incompatible on the wire and this has 
> created a multi-decade ipv6 charlie foxtrot?

Yes, I suggest mentioning that to Vint, Bob and a few others in 1977, so
that they can design IPv4 with extensible addresses. People in
2016 will be grateful.

   Brian

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.15.0 | Report a Bug | By Email