IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

Ted Faber <faber@ISI.EDU> Wed, 09 July 2008 17:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE213A685C; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB4B3A67D8 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.603
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.603 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.004, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ie2rWWK+uuqx for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E76E3A685C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zod.isi.edu (zod.isi.edu [128.9.168.221]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m69HURO9010874 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from faber@localhost) by zod.isi.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m69HUQH8011163; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:30:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from faber)
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 10:30:26 -0700
From: Ted Faber <faber@ISI.EDU>
To: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
Subject: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
Message-ID: <20080709173026.GC2905@zod.isi.edu>
References: <20080709014259.GJ92049@zod.isi.edu> <200807090254.m692sO6Y069899@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <200807090254.m692sO6Y069899@drugs.dv.isc.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-url: http://www.isi.edu/~faber
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: faber@zod.isi.edu
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@MIT.EDU>, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0732524867=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 12:54:24PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > I don't "want" anything in this space.  I don't care if the root's
> > unchanged or as wide as .com.
> 
> 	There was a clear decision to move from a single label
> 	hostnames to multiple label hostnames (RFC 921).  You are
> 	attempting to reverse that decision.

I've said everything I want to say about this topic, but I'd like to
reiterate that I'm not attempting to reverse any decision.  I have no
hidden agenda and I am not advocating a policy position based on
technical and conceptual feasibility (or anything else).

I don't care which one the community picks here.  I've now asserted it
twice.

I don't care which one the community picks here.  Now it's true.

-- 
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber           PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email