IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 23 January 2015 02:12 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7101A00CD; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:12:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62Zk9cBb8xrN; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:12:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x232.google.com (mail-oi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09B371A00C5; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:12:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-f50.google.com with SMTP id h136so4485717oig.9; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:12:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=JX28/2GxeONSoj3sVktwJgc8Syl8zHzwmDnRAs0j3RY=; b=x/pqmza+jhV2bkR1x8iFO5+UwXF5ktUw2jUj8o+WvWWqLxh+d4EmSb80fX2hW/3dSk 9AQcBkhSwv74Uzqty7Hmwf1W1h08fWWv42jy81s0J2YgYE8HfrUIP1iv1LpOEoSpZC/s h5r9bXPLfv1Fgd/RLG9xGwIowkDg7mmJONC7YNY5w2iShEGVFd8TAh7YqrEteLjPgirc JdlnGOFveQQva8xV09AJQZD5NRzlPJcfJ1BrvykbWgpvfXhtw52wUfMDiY+eTOUoFyzo 6o8K24xUjYSuCKpPGGoixL1A4k32u4F4P032vqQ3gwf1BcdQCqJJ11539529lRlixWrb NvVw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.185.198 with SMTP id j189mr2798959oif.72.1421979146305; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:12:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.202.226.136 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:12:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.202.226.136 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:12:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0A78F531-9E8E-4ED1-BD8F-AAE70684DB24@piuha.net>
References: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362DE459@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com> <CABkgnnUwNQUcFg5w5HFpSQrAUxtbqG_UN-_WDGop1eqqoCS+Aw@mail.gmail.com> <1421779730757.42642@crf.canon.fr> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362E9050@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com> <B42673AB-2819-42F5-BC63-6418449FC030@piuha.net> <54C13996.2030906@crf.canon.fr> <0A78F531-9E8E-4ED1-BD8F-AAE70684DB24@piuha.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:12:26 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVBCK-yy9WitKCVqitcXssOHgBc2c+3UeRO09mAHa3A8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ce80ee4c695050d48512c"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/GANW-bugf6t8YuW8MTw2ii1UNew>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, "General Area Review Team (gen-art@ietf.org)" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "fenix@google.com" <fenix@google.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Hervé Ruellan <herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr>, David Black <david.black@emc.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 02:12:30 -0000

I definitely want to avoid making prescriptive statements about what to
protect, even couched as suggestions. However, I think that a more generic
statement that describes the characteristics of a header that might need
protection is definitely a good idea.

If Herve doesn't get there first, I can purpose text that concentrates on
the coincidence of secret and small/easy-to-guess..
On Jan 22, 2015 3:17 PM, "Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:

> Thanks for the response. I think this may slightly enhance the feeling
> that the list may not be needed.
>
> Jari
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email