Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorate reviews]

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Thu, 07 November 2019 21:41 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C330D120843 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 13:41:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r8q00nlNftV4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 13:41:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D5581201DC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 13:41:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1137A21111; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 16:41:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 07 Nov 2019 16:41:22 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=q1Q2elc/J4SAYoggAlh7wl3lnnkuXy3uNmEWuKaj0 60=; b=Gt6LSGxQhp6H1i+OsDFOsHwFQq3EBQ8C1SB79ChSjRo7l1ww0h1oWfDqv OgoN0rhwJS8hr+P2JoJLjQpovsdFclE9LK5TzQbQGIQIKVD4SZCBHfXHvQipchir z8gqCwKoE9F7QbmKud3uOAOfEMyPin9dJD3KQ/n7R9cKexmWkddC/b1o3dBY1RA5 RW2y1BwuSSoOADzvg38shRw0bzgcskRBowY3fTgNUChIv6luex0cSnrM9F+4ykCt JTvgfVeptS0tv1DPIRkBUcLPs/l2wEkH7lfKmXE2/NgP+BcqygS+2eFJmIwJQh6Q JzwmV2pExNn3LEEOjf/Xj7lZ+lmvA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:gY_EXbodDwOH1O9pYtU0g2Z0JGg6btqx-I3PVrGHwmYYV3dP6cWPMg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudduledgudehvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfesth ekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihhthhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvght fihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomheqnecukfhppedutdekrddvvddurddukedtrd duheenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgv rhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:gY_EXeZaGnQO_PMmGUtna-XV9cMfrc0VapUV1xDUr9I7wafXBLgOcw> <xmx:gY_EXdpYNswLClMxuUgmgKE5pACV7husT4IFLRiBlA7DPk_ms7Ktkg> <xmx:gY_EXSk52NeDuaEdpRZuouXlX6zNfqqZdZAiezeEJuLQBv1_FxL6VQ> <xmx:go_EXWv8wIRYdAyaVAuxe3Y9T1XD9nCiDP4g2TlHJ8aSumlh_qMUAQ>
Received: from [192.168.1.97] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 609C7306005E; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 16:41:21 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorate reviews]
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <157279399807.13506.13363770981495597049.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0EF64763-BA25-468A-B387-91445A61D318@gmail.com> <CAJU8_nUovmFmgNiYx0ez_1f+GPdU9xGViDYWfowEEomrn0pyDw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1911040841160.27600@bofh.nohats.ca> <CE06CC6D-E37F-4C90-B782-D14B1D715D4B@cable.comcast.com> <38E47448-63B4-4A5D-8A9D-3AB890EBDDDD@akamai.com> <09886edb-4302-b309-9eaa-f016c4487128@gmail.com> <26819.1572990657@localhost> <2668fa45-7667-51a6-7cb6-4b704c7fba5a@isode.com> <2C97D18E-3DA0-4A2D-8179-6D86EB835783@gmail.com> <91686B28-9583-4A8E-AF8A-E66977B1FE13@gmail.com> <012b9437-4440-915c-f1f9-b85e1b0be768@gmail.com> <10457.1573157263@localhost>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <f963ece8-413b-c18b-b017-79b227ee8abd@network-heretics.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 16:41:20 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <10457.1573157263@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/GCQYDdA52jIwCpmoSwZS0Y10MPQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 21:41:24 -0000

On 11/7/19 3:07 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:

> Would you consider if these new documents are *RFC*s or, would you consider
> if we could make a new document series for these documents? I would suggest
> that it become the*Proposed Standard*  series.  That is, we'd change our
> first step to not be an*RFC*.

At first glance I find this idea appealing.   I'd like to see it 
explored.   At lot depends on other factors - e.g. when, relative to 
interop testing, do we look for potential harm to other interests?

(though maybe we don't need a new document series - maybe we just need a 
way of designating certain Internet-Drafts as being suitable for interop 
testing and/or limited deployment)

Keith