Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Sat, 14 March 2020 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 842143A15A3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 07:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.111
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.111 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.463, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D2LGxL1AcQBP for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 07:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-f173.google.com (mail-oi1-f173.google.com [209.85.167.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DD083A15A2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 07:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-f173.google.com with SMTP id p125so12736808oif.10 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 07:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MFPh3Ns8kOGgwX6E6c8A519xJQu3tiFi5c7NisCNrCE=; b=TaEPAjD/APYXq77ck7+UBnuhUCRQDxmY7OYqs1dYwJw9zaJW9k5HFT8yjv2//bfTcL TsdJznUfxGlc8cSV0KF+56bMQ3fONc4xyWkDYzWT5k32Ws9LXl7rAjNBjVe1GM6/7/v8 dZ7f5URBvMcECFc5CUU8g5nFjrAg1i+vlb+pMZN40SpkjGAPgmwLOkBwEJybeif6lkmo fJ+PhbkDuHSLxH79NOvLurguc65e0DD9CpL9OTZZ3/lmpYtj40J2vR58S9O57+989BK8 VF231svhdOVARQkwLtKGtdaolImIPxuzAiZKaMLlt61GsmvbRBHOdFFPJFZR8GWLzx34 8yFQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3Uu2FZKKmrY8WbAjiNu8nc7ZlhvhUY1jLA8ptJVkSunSFuDh1z BfgLxThoAIcYTfRoX5kviB+ebbBjhTCDWkkLkus=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: =?utf-8?q?ADFU+vv8/hfAShDEyIT004J9LNW8pwhOQ0CA5iQQ8HYQ?= =?utf-8?q?oUZmHRurQJTdWUu/9wU0zrlabw7WFwyowVXXMbFO7kWArwg=3D?=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:45:: with SMTP id v5mr10692941oic.90.1584195847348; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 07:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <20200313162255.GB8656@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20200313204317.GR21734@vurt.meerval.net> <CAA=duU0jN0y12_HpzzK73BRD+x19ZQn74V=ju2_wwS-RUL_9Yw@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJ+r2OrFVbZj=3fTRUapkDkxap2T-p+QzNfaqK4N0c+haQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJc3aaMX87WjG6__jE0O3r4NufRS2kf=F9y2FBifbXeSpAVGTQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJc3aaMX87WjG6__jE0O3r4NufRS2kf=F9y2FBifbXeSpAVGTQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 10:23:56 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwi=CgevH9-O_AGACiZnWFAMJJVL1o6tL=ZiTbLuFO_21Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
To: Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bc66c005a0d15631"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/GKo45VvziiG5myVfaejGZDnH280>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 14:24:10 -0000

1) For purposes of seating the incoming IAB and IESG, declare that IETF 107
happened on schedule

2) For purposes of NOMCON, declare that it has not.

Thus eligibility carried over from the previous five meetings. This is
probably going to be within 90% of the pool that would have been eligible
had 107 taken place so its a good start.

3) Count virtual registration for 107 as eligibility.

This might result in some people who would not have been eligible being
eligible but the criteria are not a divine mandate in the first place and
it remains an utterly ridiculous method of selecting officers.